Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cost of pediatric gastroenteritis hospitalizations in the United States.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026

Same author

Achievable Benchmarks of Care in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Hypothermia and Mortality Among Children in the Emergency Department.

Pediatrics·2026

Same author

Pediatric secondary transports within a regional emergency medical services system.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026

Same author

Children Hospitalized With Pneumonia Who Complete Oral Antibiotic Treatment Without Complications.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

Same author

Performance of Open-Source LLMs in Identifying Pediatric Pneumonia From Free-Text Chest Radiograph Reports.

Pediatric emergency care·2026

Same journal

Downward Trends in Neonatal Hepatitis B Vaccine Uptake: 2021 to 2025.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

Same journal

Use of Stigmatizing Language in Pediatric Clinician Notes.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

Same journal

Lead Locally, Impact Nationally: Roles and Responsibilities for Site PI in PHM Research.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

Same journal

Trends, Outcomes, and Resource Use of Pediatric Tracheostomy in Alberta: A Cohort Study.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

Same journal

Too Complex to Treat? Equity in Access to Inpatient Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

Same journal

Caregiver Perspectives on Preventing Future Hospitalizations for Children With Medical Complexity.

Hospital pediatrics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Performing a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Sriram Ramgopal¹, Jillian Benedetti², Jillian M Cotter³

¹Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Hospital Pediatrics

|January 2, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Multicenter retrospective studies offer a cost-effective way to study rare pediatric conditions. Rigorous design and data management ensure reliable, generalizable findings for clinical practice.

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

Area of Science:

Clinical Research Methodology
Pediatric Epidemiology
Observational Study Design

Background:

Multicenter retrospective studies are pragmatic and cost-effective for rare pediatric conditions.
They offer an alternative to expensive prospective research.
Well-designed studies yield clinically important and generalizable findings.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss key considerations for performing robust multicenter retrospective studies.
To highlight methods for ensuring data quality and reliability across sites.
To address potential biases and statistical challenges in retrospective research.

Main Methods:

Utilizing various observational designs (cross-sectional, cohort, case-control).
Implementing systematic data collection and management strategies.
Ensuring consistent case ascertainment and data extraction across participating sites.

Main Results:

Identified common issues: selection bias, ascertainment bias, and confounding.
Emphasized the importance of operational manuals, training, and regular meetings for data reliability.
Highlighted the necessity of proactive statistical approaches for missing data.

Conclusions:

Careful planning, effective collaboration, and technological integration are crucial.
Retrospective multicenter studies can produce valuable and accurate findings when executed rigorously.
Adherence to ethical guidelines, including IRB approval and data use agreements, is essential.