Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Using Unidirectional Rotations to Improve Vestibular System Asymmetry in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction
Published on: August 30, 2019
Galvanic vestibular stimulation for the postural rehabilitation of HTLV-1-associated myelopathy
Tatiana Rocha Silva1, Ludimila Labanca2, Júlia Fonseca de Morais Caporali1
1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Introduction:
Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a simple, safe, and noninvasive method of neurostimulation that can be used to improve body balance. Several central nervous system diseases cause alterations in body balance, including HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM).
Objective:
To test GVS as a balance rehabilitation strategy for HAM.
Methods:
This study is a quasi-experimental clinical trial in which postural balance was compared before and after a GVS rehabilitation protocol applied to 20 patients with HAM, 12 women and 8 men, average age of 78 and 79 years, respectively. They were followed for nine months after the end of the GVS protocol, which consisted of one GVS session per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The GVS current intensity was progressively increased from 1.0 milliamperes (mA) to 3.5 mA until the third session and maintained at 3.5 mA until the 12th session. The electrical stimulation time progressively increased from 9 min in the first session to 18 min in the second session and maintained at 30 min from the third session onwards. Postural balance was assessed by Time up and go test (TUG), Berg balance scale (BBS) and posturography that were performed before the beginning of the intervention, during the intervention (6th week), at the end of the intervention (12th week) and after 9 months of follow-up without electrical stimulation.
Results:
In a blind comparison, in the 12th week of stimulation, improvement was observed in all the tests. In TUG, time in seconds changed from 28 before to 18 after GVS (p < 0,001). In BBS, the score changed from 29.00 before to 41.00 points after GVS. In posturography, the stability limit improved after the intervention (p < 0.05). However, after nine months without stimulation, the gain was lost for TUG, for BBS and for stability limit.
Conclusion:
GVS was an effective method to improve postural instability of patients with HAM in the short term, but the gain in postural stability was not maintained in the long term. A device for home use may be an option for long-term use.
More Related Videos
00:06Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
Published on: August 28, 2019
11:06A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
Published on: April 12, 2016