The Role of Machine Learning in the Detection of Cardiac Fibrosis in Electrocardiograms: Scoping Review

Julia Handra1,2, Hannah James1,2, Ashery Mbilinyi2

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

JMIR Cardio
|January 3, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Machine learning (ML) applied to electrocardiograms (ECGs) shows promise for detecting cardiac fibrosis. However, current studies need larger datasets and external validation for reliable clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death globally.
  • Cardiac fibrosis contributes to cardiovascular disease pathophysiology, affecting heart structure and function.
  • Current methods for detecting cardiac fibrosis are invasive, costly, or inaccessible, highlighting the need for improved diagnostic tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and evaluate machine learning (ML) applications using electrocardiograms (ECGs) for cardiac fibrosis detection.
  • To synthesize the current landscape of ECG-based ML approaches for identifying cardiac fibrosis.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive scoping review of research was conducted across major scientific databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, DBLP) up to October 2024.
  • Studies employing ML techniques on ECG or vectorcardiogram data for cardiac fibrosis detection were included if they provided detailed methodologies and performance metrics.
  • Data extraction and eligibility assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, focusing on ML models, performance, study design, and limitations.

Main Results:

  • Eleven studies utilizing ML for ECG-based cardiac fibrosis detection were identified, employing classical (73%), ensemble (27%), and deep learning (36%) models.
  • Support vector machines were common classical models, achieving accuracies up to 93%. Deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks, showed promise with AUCs up to 0.89.
  • A large-scale study (n=14,052) using CNNs achieved an AUC of 0.84, outperforming cardiologists (AUC 0.63-0.66). However, limited sample sizes and lack of external validation were noted.

Conclusions:

  • ML-augmented ECG analysis offers a potentially accessible and cost-effective method for cardiac fibrosis detection.
  • Significant limitations exist, including study design flaws and insufficient external validation, which question the generalizability and clinical applicability of current findings.
  • Future research should focus on prospective designs, diverse datasets, advanced ML models, and rigorous validation to enable clinical implementation and improve patient outcomes.
Abstract