Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

95
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
95
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

88
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
88
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

146
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
146
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

90
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
90
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

85
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
85
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

299
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
299

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Long-term effects of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a multicountry, population-based randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Extending inferences from a randomized trial to trial-eligible and treatment-candidate target populations: examples of generalizability and transportability.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Why use methods that require proportional hazards?

Mats J Stensrud1, Miguel A Hernàn2,3,4

  • 1Institute of Mathematics, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|January 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The proportional hazards assumption in survival analysis is often unnecessary and implausible for medical studies, especially randomized trials. Alternative survival analysis methods that avoid this assumption are generally preferable.

Keywords:
causal inferencehazard ratiosproportional hazardssurvival analysis

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze the time until an event of interest occurs.
  • The proportional hazards (PH) assumption is a common requirement for certain survival analysis models, such as the Cox proportional hazards model.
  • This assumption posits that the hazard ratio between any two individuals remains constant over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the necessity and plausibility of the proportional hazards assumption in medical research.
  • To advocate for the use of alternative survival analysis techniques that do not depend on the proportional hazards assumption.
  • To guide researchers in selecting appropriate statistical methods for time-to-event data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critique of the proportional hazards assumption in the context of survival analysis.
  • Discussion of the implications of violating the proportional hazards assumption in medical studies.
  • Exploration of alternative survival analysis methods that relax or do not require the proportional hazards assumption.

Main Results:

  • The proportional hazards assumption is frequently violated in real-world medical data, particularly in randomized controlled trials.
  • Testing for proportional hazards can be complex and may not always yield clear-cut results.
  • Alternative survival analysis methods offer greater flexibility and robustness when the proportional hazards assumption is questionable.

Conclusions:

  • The proportional hazards assumption is often implausible and unnecessary in many medical studies.
  • Researchers should consider and utilize survival analysis methods that do not rely on the proportional hazards assumption.
  • Adopting methods free from the proportional hazards assumption can lead to more reliable and interpretable results in survival data analysis.