Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defense against nuclear weapons: a decision analysis.

J M Orient

    Southern Medical Journal
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Preparing for nuclear weapons consequences is a medical necessity. A decision analysis reveals that a strategy of preparedness can mitigate maximal casualties from nuclear attacks, unlike current US policy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Public health risks of not vaccinating children.

    JAMA·2001
    Same author

    The pharmaceutical industry--to whom is it accountable?

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    Thyroid protection.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
    Same author

    Thyroid protection.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
    Same author

    A wolf in sheep's clothing: the Clinton health reform plan.

    Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1996
    Same author

    Medicare disaster imminent.

    Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia·1995
    Same journal

    The Five Essential Concepts of Developmental Medicine: A Medical Paradigm for People with Developmental Disabilities.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    α-Gal Syndrome in the South: Why We Need Treatment Trials, Not Just Tick Prevention.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Association between Main Pancreatic Duct Size, Comorbidities, and Fistula Formation after Whipple Procedure for Pancreatic Cancer.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Impact of Temperature Variation on Patients with Acute Severe Asthma.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of ChatGPT-4 to Answer Clinical EHR Messages in Sports Medicine.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnostic Utility and Clinical Implications of Inpatient Fecal Occult Blood Testing.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Medical Preparedness
    • Nuclear Weapons Policy

    Background:

    • Nuclear weapons pose a significant public health threat.
    • Current US policy prioritizes attack prevention over preparedness for consequences like blast injuries and radiation sickness.
    • This approach may lead to maximal casualties in the event of a nuclear attack.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the medical imperative of responding to the public health threat of nuclear weapons.
    • To analyze the risks and benefits of shifting US strategy towards preparedness for nuclear attack consequences.
    • To clarify the implications of current US policy versus a preparedness strategy.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing a decision analysis approach.
    • Comparing the outcomes of a non-preparedness strategy with a preparedness strategy.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessing the potential for mitigating casualties from blast injuries and radiation sickness.

    • Main Results:

    • The current US strategy, focused solely on prevention, risks maximal casualties.
    • A strategy of preparedness offers a pathway to reduce severe outcomes.
    • Decision analysis highlights the benefits of preparedness measures.

    Conclusions:

    • A medical and public health imperative exists to prepare for nuclear weapon consequences.
    • Shifting from a prevention-only approach to one that includes preparedness is medically advisable.
    • Preparedness strategies can significantly reduce the impact of nuclear attacks on public health.