Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Accelerating biosimilar market access: the case for allowing earlier standing
S Sean Tu1, Rachel Goode2, Matthew Turner2
1West Virginia University College of Law, 101 Law School Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Abstract:
Biosimilars, which are affordable alternatives to biologic medicines, face delays in market entry due to the current patent litigation framework under the Biologic Price Competition and Innovation Act. Currently, biosimilar manufacturers can only initiate patent litigation to attempt to clear weak and invalid patents after submitting their Biologic License Application to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which happens after completing extensive, and costly clinical trials. By contrast, generic drug manufacturers can start litigation earlier due to shorter development times and less stringent clinical requirements, allowing them to launch immediately after the primary patent expires. We propose allowing biosimilars to begin patent litigation at the start of phase 3 clinical trials, the final stage of biosimilar development, where the product and manufacturing process and product profile are largely finalized. This change would enable biosimilar firms to resolve patent issues well before the brand biologic's primary patent expiration date, potentially reducing market entry delays by about 1.8 years. This article examines the issues surrounding initiation of biosimilar litigation and suggests litigation reforms to expedite biosimilar market availability.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence: Overview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Presystemic Elimination
Preclinical Development: Overview
Factors Influencing Bioavailability: First-Pass Elimination

