Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I01:27

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

666
In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
666
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

91
Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
91
Assessment of apical radial pulse01:25

Assessment of apical radial pulse

683
Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
683
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

509
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
509
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.1K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Lp(a)/BMI Gradient in Osteocardiology: The Copenhagen Connection.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2022
Same author

Bench to bedside defining calcific aortic valve disease: osteocardiology.

Expert review of cardiovascular therapy·2020
Same author

TIEG1 is upregulated in Lrp5/6-mediated valve osteogenesis.

Journal of cellular biochemistry·2018
Same author

Aortic Valve Disease Is Not a Monogenetic Disorder.

JACC. Basic to translational science·2018
Same author

Osteocardiology: Defining the Go/No-Go Time Point for Therapy.

Cardiology·2018
Same author

Effect Modifications of Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Progression of Aortic Stenosis (from the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis [SEAS] Study).

The American journal of cardiology·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2025

Aortic Ring Assay
09:12

Aortic Ring Assay

Published on: November 24, 2009

31.0K

A Tale of Two Rings: The Need for Informed Consent.

Nalini M Rajamannan1,2

  • 1Most Sacred Heart of Jesus Cardiovascular and Valvular Institute, Chicago IL.

Journal of Case Reports and Medical History
|January 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Two investigational medical devices from 2006 failed to gain FDA approval and were never used in patient clinical trials. Patients involved did not provide informed consent for these unapproved device uses.

More Related Videos

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

9.8K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2025

Aortic Ring Assay
09:12

Aortic Ring Assay

Published on: November 24, 2009

31.0K
Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

9.8K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Device Regulation
  • Clinical Trial Ethics
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Device and Radiologic Health (CDRH) has a long-standing mission to ensure the safety of medical devices.
  • Regulatory standards must continually adapt to the fast-paced advancements within the medical device industry.
  • Historical review of specific investigational devices is crucial for understanding regulatory evolution and patient protection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a historical account of two specific investigational medical devices approved in 2006.
  • To examine the regulatory status and clinical trial outcomes of these devices.
  • To assess the adherence to informed consent protocols in patient trials involving these devices.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of historical records pertaining to two investigational medical devices.
  • Analysis of FDA approval status and clinical trial documentation.
  • Examination of patient informed consent records associated with the trials.

Main Results:

  • The two investigational devices, dating back to 2006, never achieved FDA approval for patient use.
  • These devices were not utilized in clinical trials involving patients.
  • Crucially, informed consent was not obtained from any patients in relation to these investigational devices.

Conclusions:

  • The case highlights critical failures in the regulatory and ethical oversight of investigational medical devices.
  • Ensuring patient safety and informed consent remains paramount, even for devices that do not reach market approval.
  • This historical account underscores the importance of rigorous FDA oversight and ethical conduct in medical device research.