Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Pitfalls of the E-Ref Procedure: Tie Values and the Proportion of the Abnormal Data
Keisuke Tachiyama1,2, Takamichi Kanbayashi1, Akiko Kawabata3
1Department of Neurology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Introduction:
Extrapolated reference values (E-Ref) procedure is a new method for determining the cutoff value without collecting the control data. We tried to apply this method to determine the cutoff value for the distal motor latency of the median nerve (median DML). During this process, we found two pitfalls of the E-Ref method. First, the E-Ref procedure did not correctly work when the DML values measured with 0.1 ms accuracy frequently took on tie values. Second, the result was influenced by the proportion of abnormal values. This study investigated these issues.
Methods:
Data of the median DML were extracted from our laboratory database. To solve the problem of tie values, we tried a wider post-smoothing window in the original E-Ref method. We also devised a modified method conducting pre-smoothing. To see the effect of the proportion of abnormal data, we simulated many datasets having different proportion of abnormal data.
Results:
In total, 1016 DML values were identified. False deflections due to tie values were often identified as the E-Ref point using the original methods even using a wider window, resulting in unrealistically low values. Modified method was free from this drawback. For all methods, the E-Ref value increased as the proportion of abnormal values increased.
Discussion:
The problem of tie values, a pitfall of the E-Ref method, might be solved by pre-smoothing the data. The E-Ref value is influenced by the proportion of the normal data, and datasets containing less than 20% abnormal data may achieve appropriate results.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
04:58Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...