Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Current Use And Evaluation Of Artificial Intelligence And Predictive Models In US Hospitals
Paige Nong1, Julia Adler-Milstein2, Nate C Apathy3
1Paige Nong (nong0016@umn.edu), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Most US hospitals use predictive models, but many do not evaluate them for bias. Ensuring fairness requires better tools and support for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning models in healthcare.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Clinical Decision Support
Background:
- The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in healthcare necessitates robust evaluation frameworks.
- Ensuring predictive models are fair, appropriate, valid, effective, and safe (FAVES) is crucial for patient outcomes and equitable care.
- Current governance practices for AI/ML models in hospitals require examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the utilization and evaluation methods of AI and predictive models in US hospitals.
- To identify how hospitals assess the accuracy and bias of these models.
- To understand factors influencing hospitals' evaluation practices for predictive models.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement.
- Examination of reported practices for using and evaluating AI and predictive models.
- Statistical analysis to identify factors associated with model evaluation.
Main Results:
- 65% of US hospitals utilize predictive models, with 79% sourcing them from electronic health record developers.
- 61% of hospitals evaluate model accuracy locally, but only 44% report local bias evaluation.
- Hospitals developing their own models, possessing high operating margins, or belonging to health systems were more likely to conduct local evaluations.
Conclusions:
- A significant gap exists in the evaluation of bias for predictive models across US hospitals.
- Developing and implementing standardized tools and support for assessing FAVES principles is essential.
- Policy interventions are needed to promote safe and equitable AI adoption, preventing a digital divide in healthcare AI.
More Related Videos
09:00TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Hospitals-I