Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Induced Electric Fields: Applications01:27

Induced Electric Fields: Applications

1.6K
An important distinction exists between the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field and the electrostatic field produced by a fixed charge distribution. Specifically, the induced electric field is nonconservative because it does not work in moving a charge over a closed path. In contrast, the electrostatic field is conservative and does no net work over a closed path. Hence, electric potential can be associated with the electrostatic field but not the induced field. The following...
1.6K
Induced Electric Fields01:23

Induced Electric Fields

3.6K
The fact that emfs are induced in circuits implies that work is being done on the conduction electrons in the wires. What can possibly be the source of this work? We know that it’s neither a battery nor a magnetic field, as a battery does not have to be present in a circuit where current is induced, and magnetic fields never do any work on moving charges. The source of the work is in fact an electric field that is induced in the wires. For example, if a stationary conductor is placed in a...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new method for optimal placement of tumor treating fields electrodes.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026
Same author

Histologically Informed Multiscale Modeling of the Neuronal Elements Activated by TMS.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mesoscale tissue properties and electric fields in brain stimulation: bridging the macroscopic and microscopic scales using layer-specific cortical conductivity.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Dual-site theta stimulation modulates connectivity, but not sequence memory in older adults.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Effects of electric field direction on TMS-based motor cortex mapping.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Direct Reconstruction of DC Cortical Conductivity from Large-Scale Electron Microscopy Data.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Layered social competition coordinates reproductive hierarchy formation in ants.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Combination epigenetic-targeted therapy increases the immunogenicity of poorly immunogenic sarcomas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Loss of LanC-like proteins delays post-injury regeneration of aging skeletal muscles.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Integrative Transfer Network: Deep Transfer Learning Across Populations and Prediction Targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Confidence-supported label-free metabolic imaging with FPhaS phase autofluorescence microscopy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Sequence-encoded autoinhibition couples mRNA decapping activity to phase separation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:33

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.1K

A Leadfield-Free Optimization Framework for Transcranially Applied Electric Currents.

Konstantin Weise1,2,3, Kristoffer H Madsen4,5, Torge Worbs5,6

  • 1Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|January 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new computational framework for optimizing brain stimulation electrode placement. It enables personalized montage design for various techniques like Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES), improving treatment efficacy.

Keywords:
Electroconvulsive TherapyMontage OptimizationTemporal Interference StimulationTranscranial Electric StimulationTumor Treating Fields

More Related Videos

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
12:00

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

262.4K
Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
10:11

Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: January 3, 2020

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
09:33

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.1K
Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
12:00

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

262.4K
Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
10:11

Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: January 3, 2020

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES), Temporal Interference Stimulation (TIS), Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), and Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) utilize electric current patterns applied to the brain.
  • Individual anatomical variations necessitate personalized electrode positioning for optimal current delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a flexible and efficient computational approach for determining individually optimal electrode montages.
  • To enable precise current pattern generation in the brain through electric field simulations.

Main Methods:

  • A leadfield-free optimization framework was developed, allowing free placement of electrodes on the head surface.
  • The approach supports arbitrary electrode shapes and configurations, preventing spatial overlaps.
  • Optimization targets maximizing field intensity in regions-of-interest and achieving a desired focality-intensity tradeoff.

Main Results:

  • Montage optimization was demonstrated for TES, TIS, ECT, and TTFields.
  • Algorithm performance was validated against reference simulations.
  • The framework requires moderate system resources, suitable for regular notebooks.

Conclusions:

  • The new framework expands possibilities for optimizing electrode montages for specific applications.
  • It complements existing methods by supporting spatially extended electrodes and arbitrary configurations.
  • The tool aids researchers in discovering innovative brain stimulation schemes and is available in SimNIBS.