Age-specific DRLs for pediatric brain CT: A review for exploring the practices in Saudi Arabia

Lama Mukhled Aljuaid1, Sarah Faiz Althobaiti1, Asmaa Abdullah Althobaiti1

  • 1Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, 21944, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Insights

Establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pediatric brain CT in Saudi Arabia reveals significant variations compared to other nations. Standardizing age-specific DRLs is crucial for optimizing radiation doses and enhancing patient safety in pediatric imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Radiological Sciences
  • Medical Physics
  • Pediatric Imaging

Background:

  • Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are essential for radiation dose optimization in medical imaging.
  • Pediatric brain CT examinations require specific DRLs due to age-related anatomical and physiological differences.
  • Variations in DRLs can exist between different countries and regulatory bodies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish and review diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for pediatric brain computed tomography (CT) in Saudi Arabia.
  • To compare these DRLs with those from nine other countries.
  • To highlight the importance of age-specific DRLs for optimizing radiation doses in pediatric patients.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases.
  • Included 9 studies investigating DRLs using patient-based and phantom-based methods.
  • Analyzed CT dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) values, comparing age group classifications.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in CTDI (mGy) and DLP (mGy·cm) values were observed between Saudi Arabia and other countries.
  • The Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) age classifications differed from those in the reviewed literature.
  • Specific SFDA DRLs for 0-5 years: CTDI 28 mGy, DLP 482 mGy·cm; for 6-15 years: CTDI 42 mGy, DLP 697 mGy·cm.

Conclusions:

  • Standardizing age-specific DRLs for pediatric brain CT is vital for radiation dose optimization and patient safety.
  • Adopting globally accepted standards and further research into DRL variations are recommended.
  • Addressing limitations such as varying age groupings and literature access is necessary for improved patient care.