Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition

Feedback Inhibition

Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!

Feedback Loops

Feedback Loops

In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.

Proofreading

Proofreading

Cross-reactivity

Cross-reactivity

Competition

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.

Cell-mediated Immune Responses

Cell-mediated Immune Responses

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Obesity is associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional extended validation study.

Urologic oncology·2017

Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of <sup>64</sup>Copper Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: Our Preliminary Experience.

Urology·2017

Same author

The Microbiome of the Prostate Tumor Microenvironment.

European urology·2017

Same author

Is transurethral resection alone enough for the diagnosis of histological variants? A single-center study.

Urologic oncology·2017

Same author

Prognostic Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Primary Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Clinical genitourinary cancer·2017

Same author

Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer.

European urology·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

How To Write a Response to Reviewers.

Andrew J Vickers¹, Melissa Assel¹, Rodney L Dunn²

¹Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

European Urology

|January 7, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Responding effectively to peer review comments is crucial for scientific paper publication. This guide offers essential tips to help authors address reviewer feedback and common pitfalls, aiming to enhance manuscript quality for acceptance.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

Area of Science:

Scientific Publishing
Academic Research
Manuscript Preparation

Background:

Peer review is an integral part of the scientific manuscript submission process.
Reviewer comments provide critical feedback for manuscript improvement.

Discussion:

Authors must understand how to effectively respond to reviewer critiques.
Common errors in responding to peer review can hinder publication.
Collaborating with editors and reviewers is key to manuscript revision.

Key Insights:

Strategic responses to peer review comments significantly improve paper quality.
Avoiding common author mistakes in the rebuttal process is vital.
The goal is to achieve manuscript acceptance through constructive dialogue.

Outlook:

Successful navigation of the peer review process leads to publication.
Enhanced manuscript quality benefits the scientific community.
Continuous improvement of scientific communication standards.