Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Demographic-Based Personalized Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Thresholds for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Diagnosis
Hunain Shiwani1, Rhodri H Davies1, Constantin-Cristian Topriceanu2
1Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
A new method adjusts left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) thresholds for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) diagnosis based on individual demographics. This approach improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces bias compared to a fixed 15-mm wall thickness threshold.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a primary cause of sudden cardiac death.
- Current diagnosis relies on a fixed threshold (≥15-mm maximum wall thickness) for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- This fixed threshold may lead to diagnostic biases in certain populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and validate a novel method for diagnosing LVH in HCM.
- The method adjusts LVH thresholds based on individual demographic factors (age, sex, body surface area).
- To offer an alternative to the current one-size-fits-all diagnostic approach.
Main Methods:
- Left ventricular maximum wall thickness (MWT) was measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and AI in three cohorts: healthy adults (n=5,067), general population (n=43,239), and HCM patients (n=2,424).
- A reference cohort was used to develop demographically adjusted LVH thresholds and individualized z-scores.
- These adjusted thresholds and z-scores were applied to the population and HCM cohorts to assess diagnostic accuracy and bias.
Main Results:
- The traditional ≥15-mm LVH threshold overestimated hypertrophy in the general population (4.3%, 89% male) and showed significant sex bias.
- Demographic-adjusted thresholds (10-17 mm range) reduced overall ascertainment (2.2%) and sex bias (56% male).
- Adjusted thresholds improved HCM diagnosis, reducing misclassification of female patients (from 27% to 7%) and male patients (from 18% to 15%) with MWT below 15 mm.
Conclusions:
- Normal heart MWT is influenced by individual demographics like age, sex, and body size.
- A fixed LVH threshold of ≥15 mm introduces significant ascertainment bias in both general and HCM populations.
- Demographic-adjusted LVH thresholds enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce bias in HCM identification.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

