Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Data Processing Methods for 3D Seismic Imaging of Subsurface Volcanoes: Applications to the Tarim Flood Basalt
Published on: August 7, 2017
Seismic anisotropy prediction using ML methods: A case study on an offshore carbonate oilfield
Guibin Zhao1, Fateh Bouchaala1, Mohamed S Jouini2
1Earth Sciences Department, Khalifa University of Sciences and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Abstract:
Estimating seismic anisotropy parameters, such as Thomson's parameters, is crucial for investigating fractured and finely layered geological media. However, many inversion methods rely on complex physical models with initial assumptions, leading to non-reproducible estimates and subjective fracture interpretation. To address these limitations, this study utilizes machine learning methods: support vector regression, extreme gradient boost, multi-layer perceptron, and a convolutional neural network. The abundance of seismic features leads to many feature combinations, making the training and testing of machine learning models challenging. Therefore, a workflow has been developed to systematically inspect seismic features and select the most appropriate one for anisotropy estimation with reasonable accuracy. Synthetic data were generated using an earth model and well data within a finite difference numerical program. After thoroughly investigating synthetic data, the amplitudes of direct and reflected waves in the time and frequency domains were selected as input features to train machine learning methods. Optimizing the machine learning hyperparameters allowed the training and testing procedures to be completed with high accuracy. Subsequently, the optimized machine learning methods were used to predict Thomsen's parameters, ε and δ, of a shaley formation in the zone area. To validate the predictions, the ε and δ estimated at a well location were compared with those obtained using a physics-based model, resulting in the least relative errors ranging from 2.92% to 7.14%.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
Energy Line and Hydraulic Gradient Line
Elastic Strain Energy for Normal Stresses
If...
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...

