Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Provider Adherence to the 2020 US Multi-Society Task Force Guidelines for Surveillance After Colonoscopy With
Benjamin E Cassell1, Katherine Scholand1, Wyatt Tarter2
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology - The University of Colorado School of Medicine; Aurora, Colorado.
Background And Aims:
The 2020 United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer guidelines for surveillance after colonoscopy with polypectomy introduced significant changes in surveillance intervals. We sought to identify rates of adherence to these new guidelines at an academic medical center.
Methods:
Average-risk screening colonoscopies where 1 to 4 polyps <10 mm were removed between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021 were included. To determine predictors of nonadherence, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted and included patient and procedure-related variables. Bayesian changepoint analysis was applied to identify timing of change in adherence. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of variability within the guidelines.
Results:
One thousand twenty-six procedures were analyzed. Adherence to the guidelines was 85%. In procedures with 1 to 2 polyps, increasing size (odds ratio [OR] 0.84 per mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.93) and a mixture of tubular adenomas (TA) and hyperplastic polyps (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.59) were associated with nonadherence. Among procedures with 1 to 2 TAs, age (OR 0.86 per 5-year increase; 95% CI: 0.75-0.99), increasing size (OR 0.86 per mm; 95% CI: 0.75-0.99) and polyp number (OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33-0.90) were associated with nonadherence. Changepoint analysis identified a potential changepoint on September 2, 2020 (95% credible interval April 2, 2020-February 22, 2020). Larger TAs were less likely to receive a 10-year recommendation (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5-0.75).
Conclusion:
Adherence rates to the 2020 surveillance guidelines were high with a potential changepoint identified on 2/9/20. Deviation from guidelines was associated with patient and procedure related variables.
More Related Videos
05:32Povidone Iodine Rectal Preparation at Time of Prostate Needle Biopsy is a Simple and Reproducible Means to Reduce Risk of Procedural Infection
Published on: September 21, 2015
07:06Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
Published on: December 8, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...