Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Private Equity in Behavior Analysis: A Reckoning.

Perspectives on behavior science·2025
Same author

A Primer on Private Equity Ownership in ABA.

Behavior analysis in practice·2025
Same author

Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2024
Same author

The Scope of Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis in State Licensure Laws.

Behavior analysis in practice·2024
Same author

A Practitioner's Guide to Measuring Procedural Fidelity.

Behavior analysis in practice·2024
Same author

Toward a further understanding of assent.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.6K

Evaluating the Effects of Compound Stimuli on Stimulus Control during Match-to-Sample Procedures.

Hannah C Grey1, Cody Morris1, Jesse Perrin1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Salve Regina University, 100 Ochre Point Avenue, Newport, RI 02840 USA.

Behavior Analysis in Practice
|January 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Compound stimuli in match-to-sample training may improve efficiency but risk limiting stimulus control. This case study presents an evaluation method to assess this risk in training arrangements.

Keywords:
Compound stimuliMatch-to-sampleRestrictive controlStimulus control

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 3, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.6K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral psychology
  • Learning sciences
  • Stimulus control

Background:

  • Compound stimuli in match-to-sample (MTS) training can enhance learning efficiency through emergent relations.
  • However, a potential drawback is that responding may become controlled by only a part of the compound stimulus, limiting generalization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and evaluate a method for assessing the impact of compound stimuli on stimulus control within MTS training.
  • To investigate the extent to which individual components of a compound stimulus acquire control over responding.

Main Methods:

  • A case study design was employed.
  • The study involved a match-to-sample training arrangement.
  • An evaluation process was developed to measure stimulus control exerted by compound stimuli.

Main Results:

  • The evaluation process demonstrated a method to quantify stimulus control.
  • Findings indicated the degree to which compound stimuli influenced responding in the MTS task.
  • The study highlighted the potential for restrictive stimulus control by individual components.

Conclusions:

  • The developed evaluation process is effective for assessing stimulus control in MTS arrangements with compound stimuli.
  • Understanding stimulus control is crucial when using compound stimuli to ensure efficient and generalized learning.
  • This research provides a framework for optimizing training strategies involving complex stimuli.