Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025
Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Without Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
P Elliott Miller1, Aliza S Gordon2, Ying Liu2
1Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA.
Background:
The use of mechanical circulatory support devices for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased over the past decade despite limited data of benefit. We sought to examine the association between intravascular microaxial left ventricular assist device (LVAD) versus intra-aortic balloon pump use in patients without cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing PCI.
Methods And Results:
This retrospective study analyzed claims data from a large, insured population who underwent PCI without CS from April 1, 2016 to July 31, 2022. Using inverse probability treatment weighting, we assessed for the association between device type and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included stroke, bleeding, incident dialysis, repeat revascularization, and total health care costs during the index admission and at 30 days. We identified 2879 patients without CS who underwent PCI with either an intra-aortic balloon pump or microaxial LVAD. The mean±SD age was 68.2±12.5 years, and 27% (n=764) were women. After propensity weighting, intravascular LVAD use was not associated with a significant difference in either in-hospital (odds ratio [OR] 1.30 [95% CI, 0.88-1.91]; P=0.19) or 30-day mortality (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.84-1.69]; P=0.33) compared with intra-aortic balloon pump use. Compared with those receiving an intra-aortic balloon pump, the mean total costs for the index admission ($96 716 versus $71 892; P<0.001) and at 30 days (+$16 671 [95% CI, $6639-$28 103]; P=0.001) were significantly higher in those receiving an intravascular LVAD. There was no significant association between device type and stroke, bleeding, incident dialysis, and repeat revascularization at any time point (all P>0.05).
Conclusions:
In patients without CS undergoing PCI, intravascular LVAD use was associated with higher costs but not associated with lower mortality. Randomized data are needed to improve device selection for patients without CS undergoing PCI.
