Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Impact of Modifier-22 on Reimbursement Following Acetabular Fracture Fixation
Caleb J Bischoff1, Kylee Rucinski1, Wayne Hoskins1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and.
Objectives:
The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Academic Level I Trauma Center.
Patient Selection Criteria:
Included were patients with third-party reimbursement for acute acetabular fracture (AO/OTA 62A-C) fixation through an open approach from 2005 to 2021 as identified using CPT codes 27226, 27227, and 27228.
Outcome Measures And Comparisons:
Chart review identified procedures where the 22-modifier for obesity or fracture complexity was applied. A cohort without the 22-modifier matched by diagnosis, primary CPT code, and insurance carrier was made for comparison. The primary outcome measure was the difference in financial reimbursement when the 22-modifier was used. Secondary outcomes were the difference in billed charges and operative time.
Results:
A total of 785 cases were initially identified with 747 meeting the inclusion criteria, and 73 having the 22-modifier applied. After removing surgeries that did not receive compensation from their insurance, 52 of these patients were compared with 52 matched cases without a 22-modifier. The 22-modifier group and the nonmodifier group had no significant difference in reimbursed amounts ($4112.71 USD vs. $3851.00, P = 0.644). However, patients in the 22-modifier group had significantly greater billed charges ($8007.35 vs. $7120.94 USD; P = 0.0096), longer operative times (301.7 vs. 240.2 minutes, P < 0.001), and greater body mass index (43.1 vs. 29.3 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Despite increased complexity and greater billed charges, the use of a 22-modifier in acetabular fracture cases did not result in improved collected reimbursements, and reimbursement is equal to when the 22-modifier is not used. Policymakers and insurers should revise reimbursement structures to better align reimbursements for acetabular fixation with surgical complexity.
Level Of Evidence:
Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
