Mechanotransduction in musculoskeletal mesenchymal tissues: implications for bone, tendon, and cartilage regenerative...

To integrate evidence on how mechanical signals regulate musculoskeletal connective-tissue biology and how cellular context and loading history shape mechanotransduction and mechanical memory.

This narrative review synthesized PubMed-indexed evidence on extracellular matrix mechanics, adhesion complexes, the cytoskeleton, nucleus, primary cilia, mechanosensitive ion channels, cell state, and loading history in bone, tendon, ligament, and cartilage.

Mechanotransduction is best understood as a coupled extracellular matrix-integrin-cytoskeleton-nucleus continuum rather than as independent cytoskeletal or nuclear drivers. Responses are conditioned by lineage stage, anatomic niche, inflammation, cellular subpopulation, and prior mechanical exposure. Mechanical memory may be encoded through persistent YAP/TAZ activity, microRNA programs, DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin architecture, and metabolic remodeling. Evidence is strongest for bone, including Piezo-dependent osteogenesis, TRPV4-mediated shear sensing, viscoelastic compression, osteocyte-stromal extracellular-vesicle signaling, and osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling. Tendon and ligament require anisotropic architecture and strain-window control, whereas cartilage shows a narrow distinction between physiologic TRPV4-associated anabolism and high-strain or inflammation-sensitized Piezo/YAP-mediated maladaptation.

Translational implications include mechanically defined cell expansion, biomaterial preconditioning, stage-specific rehabilitation, and potency assays incorporating loading history. Direct clinical validation of stable perioperative cellular mechanical memory remains limited. Future studies should combine controlled mechanical perturbation with bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, chromatin-accessibility profiling, spatial methods, and perturbational genomics.