Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms.

F C Groen, I T Young, G Ligthart

    Cytometry
    |March 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study compares 11 autofocusing functions for optical instruments, identifying the squared magnitude gradient, squared Laplacian, and normalized image standard deviation as optimal for real-time video systems.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hæmorrhagic Malarial Fever.

    The Southern medical record·2022
    Same author

    Three-dimensional skeletonization: principle and algorithm.

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2012
    Same author

    Measuring the wavelength-dependent divergence of transmission through sub-wavelength hole-arrays by spectral imaging.

    Optics express·2009
    Same author

    Shading correction: compensation for illumination and sensor inhomogeneities.

    Current protocols in cytometry·2008
    Same author

    Calibration: sampling density and spatial resolution.

    Current protocols in cytometry·2008
    Same author

    Model-based resolution: applying the theory in quantitative microscopy.

    Applied optics·2008

    Area of Science:

    • Optical Engineering
    • Image Processing
    • Instrumentation

    Background:

    • Autofocusing is critical for optical instruments.
    • Numerous autofocusing algorithms exist in scientific literature.
    • Real-time video acquisition demands efficient autofocusing functions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To objectively compare 11 autofocusing functions.
    • To determine the most suitable functions for real-time video systems.
    • To evaluate performance across diverse image types.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of 11 autofocusing algorithms.
    • Testing with three distinct image classes.
    • Objective performance evaluation for real-time video acquisition.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Identified squared magnitude gradient as a top-performing focus function.
    • Squared Laplacian also demonstrated high suitability.
    • Normalized image standard deviation proved effective for autofocusing.

    Conclusions:

    • Squared magnitude gradient, squared Laplacian, and normalized image standard deviation are recommended for real-time autofocusing.
    • These functions offer robust performance for varied imaging scenarios.
    • The study provides objective data for selecting optimal autofocus algorithms.