Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
In-Person and Video-Based Education: Do They Affect Pressure Injury Knowledge in Nursing?
Demet İnangil1, Nilüfer Ertürk, Elif Lale Pakdil
1Demet İnangil, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor, Nursing Department, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. Nilüfer Ertürk, RN, and Elif Lale Pakdil, RN, are nurses in the Ostomy and Wound Care Department, Health Sciences University, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul. İlayda Türkoğlu, MSN, RN, is Research Assistant, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, University of Health Sciences. Özgül Torun, RN, is a nurse in the Ostomy and Wound Care Department, Health Sciences University, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital. Ayşe Kabuk, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak.
Objective:
To determine how training on the nursing care of pressure injuries (PIs) affects knowledge levels and satisfaction.
Methods:
This study was semiexperimental, conducted in the form of a pretest and posttest in one group of 105 nurses working in a training and research hospital. The training took place in person and via video. All nurses included in the study group first received in-person training in 15-person groups followed by weekly video training for 4 consecutive weeks. Before training, investigators assessed the nurses' PI knowledge using the Nurses' Knowledge Level Assessment for PI Care (NKLAPIC; pretest). After the in-person module (posttest 1) and video-based module (posttest 2), investigators provided the NKLAPIC again. The independent-sample test, one-way analysis of variance, repeated-test-measures analysis of variance, Bonferroni test, and pairwise comparisons were used in data analysis.
Results:
Mean NKLAPIC scores were 47.71 ± 13.5 (out of 100 points) at pretraining, 68.5 ± 12.32 after the in-person training, and peaked at 72.38 ± 4.74 after video-based training (P < .001). Video-based training appeared to lead to a larger increase in knowledge levels than in-person training alone (P < .001). Further, although the average satisfaction score given to the in-person training was 3.97 ± 0.93, the same score for the online training was 4.12 ± 0.95 (P > .05).
Conclusions:
Outcomes suggest that in-person training and video-based training regarding PI care improve the knowledge levels of nurses.
Related Concept Videos
Current Trends in Nursing II
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Current Trends in Nursing I
Methods of Documentation III: PIE

