Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

04:48
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
Published on: July 5, 2024
367
Adaptive Tip Selection for DAG-Shard-Based Federated Learning with High Concurrency and Fairness
Ruiqi Xiao1, Yun Cao1, Bin Xia1
1School of Computer Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 11, 2025
Summary
This study introduces DAG-Shard-based Federated Learning (DSFL), enhancing training concurrency for large models. DSFL improves accuracy and F1 scores compared to existing DAG-FL and Blockchain-FL methods, ensuring fairness and robustness.
Area of Science:
- Machine Learning
- Distributed Systems
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Federated learning faces challenges with high-concurrency training of large models and big data.
- Existing alternatives like Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) and sharding lack detailed consensus designs and shard size impact analysis.
- Blockchain-based federated learning has limitations in training concurrency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance training concurrency and performance in federated learning using a combined DAG and shard approach.
- To investigate the impact of consensus algorithms and shard sizes on federated learning.
- To develop an adaptive algorithm for improved training performance and concurrent control of DAG structure.
Main Methods:
- Combining DAG and sharding techniques for federated learning.
- Designing three tip selection consensus algorithms and an adaptive algorithm.
- Implementing an incentive mechanism to validate model fairness and robustness.
- Adjusting shard and algorithm parameters for concurrent control of DAG scale.
Main Results:
- DSFL demonstrates significant improvements in accuracy (8.19-12.21%) and F1 score (7.27-11.73%) over DAG-FL.
- DSFL shows accuracy gains (7.82-11.86%) and F1 score improvements (8.89-13.27%) compared to Blockchain-FL.
- The proposed model outperforms DAG-FL and Chains-FL on both balanced and imbalanced datasets, proving its effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- DAG-Shard-based Federated Learning (DSFL) offers superior performance in high-concurrency scenarios.
- DSFL provides enhanced fairness and robustness compared to existing federated learning approaches.
- The adaptive algorithm and concurrency control mechanisms effectively manage DAG scale and improve training outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Parallel Processing
145
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
145
Improving Translational Accuracy
8.7K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
8.7K
Associative Learning
287
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Classical conditioning, also known...
287
Cluster Sampling Method
11.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.6K
Maximum Size of Aggregate
75
The maximum size of aggregate is defined as the aperture of the sieve retaining 15 percent or more of the particles present in the aggregate sample. The aggregate's maximum size impacts the concrete's water requirement, workability, and strength. Larger aggregates reduce the surface area needing cement paste coverage, which can lower water needs, thereby allowing a decrease in the water-to-cement ratio when the desired workability and richness of the mix are to be maintained, which can...
75
Differential Leveling
136
Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...
136

