Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Isolated Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Liver Metastases of Uveal Melanoma
Published on: January 25, 2015
Interim-PET predicts progression-free survival in stage IV Hodgkin lymphoma treated with upfront brentuximab
Chiara Rusconi1, Angelica Barone2, Andrea Visentin3
1Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (AVD) demonstrated to improve survival compared to ABVD as frontline treatment of advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). We retrospectively collected data of 99 stage IV HL patients treated off-protocol with BV-AVD to evaluate the predictive role of interim-PET. Median age was 36 years (range: 18-82); 83.8% patients completed all planned 6 cycles and 80.8% obtained complete response at PET6. Median follow-up was 14.4 months; 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 84.1% (CI 95%: 77-91.9) and 96.9% (CI 95%: 93.6-100). PET2-negative patients had a superior 1-year PFS compared to PET2-positive patients: 90.0% vs 46.2% (p < .001). At multivariable analysis, PET2 positivity retained unfavorable statistical significance in PFS: HR 4.6 (95% CI: 1.4-15.2, p = .009). BV-AVD was confirmed to be effective in a real-world setting, while PET2-positive patients displayed a remarkably lower 1-year PFS than that previously reported and might benefit from a PET-driven approach.
Brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (AVD) demonstrated to improve survival compared to ABVD as frontline treatment of advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL). We retrospectively collected data of 99 stage IV HL patients treated off-protocol with BV-AVD to evaluate the predictive role of interim-PET. Median age was 36 years (range: 18-82); 83.8% patients completed all planned 6 cycles and 80.8% obtained complete response at PET6. Median follow-up was 14.4 months; 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 84.1% (CI 95%: 77-91.9) and 96.9% (CI 95%: 93.6-100). PET2-negative patients had a superior 1-year PFS compared to PET2-positive patients: 90.0% vs 46.2% (p < .001). At multivariable analysis, PET2 positivity retained unfavorable statistical significance in PFS: HR 4.6 (95% CI: 1.4-15.2, p = .009). BV-AVD was confirmed to be effective in a real-world setting, while PET2-positive patients displayed a remarkably lower 1-year PFS than that previously reported and might benefit from a PET-driven approach.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
09:44Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Based on the Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reaction
Published on: January 29, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers