Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025
Application of an Amplitude-integrated EEG Monitor Cerebral Function Monitor to Neonates
Published on: September 6, 2017
Adherence to Recommendations and Yield of Critical Care EEG Monitoring: A Prospective Multicentric Study
Flavio Bellante1, Susana Ferrao Santos2, Ludovic Gérard3
1Service de Neurologie, CHU Marie Curie, Charleroi, Belgique.
Purpose:
The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society has provided a set of recommendations on the use of critical care EEG monitoring (CEEG). However, these recommendations have not been prospectively validated. We aimed to assess the adherence to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations for obtaining CEEG for different indications and the yield of obtained CEEG according to these different indications.
Methods:
This was a multicenter prospective observational study of critically ill adult patients between April 01, 2022, and June 22, 2022, in two academic medical centers and a large teaching hospital. Indications for CEEG, according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society recommendations, were determined based on clinical data at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. The use of CEEG and detection of electrographic seizures were retrieved from the EEG databases.
Results:
A total of 600 patients were enrolled in this study. The primary admission diagnoses were medical (49%), surgical (30%), or neurologic/neurosurgical (21%). Approximately 60% of patients had an altered mental status. A few (6%) patients had a preceding clinical seizure, and 1% had generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Indications were identified in 226 admissions. Of these patients, 88 (39%) underwent CEEG. In addition, 12 patients underwent CEEG without clear indications. Of the 100 patients, 33 (33%) had electrographic seizures. Adherence to recommendations and yields was highest for refractory status epilepticus, altered mental status after any clinical seizure, and acute brain injury. Adherence and yield varied the most and were inversely correlated in the group of patients without acute brain injury, suggesting that additional clinical factors may have contributed to patient selection.
Conclusions:
Patients meeting American Clinical Neurophysiology Society indications and receiving CEEG had a high seizure risk. Emerging CEEG programs should focus on epilepsy-related and neurologic diagnosis. Although recommendations effectively identify groups of patients with a high seizure risk, additional clinical factors might further help select candidates in the low-risk group.
