Performance of an Algorithm Grading Surgery-Related Adverse Events According to the Clavien-Dindo Classification

Lisen Båverud Olsson1,2, Dennis Parkan1, Annika Sjövall1,2

  • 1Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Annals of Surgery
|January 15, 2025
PubMed

Insights

An automated algorithm accurately grades surgery-related adverse events (AEs) using electronic health record (EHR) data. This tool shows strong agreement with manual grading, potentially improving patient care and reducing costs.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Surgical Outcomes Research
  • Health Data Science

Background:

  • Surgery-related adverse events (AEs) are frequent, increasing patient morbidity and healthcare expenses.
  • Manual chart review remains the standard for grading AEs, a resource-intensive process.
  • Automated grading algorithms using electronic health record (EHR) data for Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification have not been previously explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of an automated algorithm for grading surgery-related adverse events (AEs) using the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) classification system.
  • To compare the algorithm's grading accuracy against manual annotations by a colorectal surgeon (gold standard) and a research nurse (current practice).

Main Methods:

  • The algorithm was developed using EHR data from Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm.
  • It assigned a C-D grade to AEs within 30 days post-surgery for 1,379 elective colorectal procedures.
  • Agreement was assessed using kappa statistics for C-D classification and intraclass correlation for the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) in a sample of 399 procedures.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement with surgeon (kappa=0.77) and nurse (kappa=0.74) for C-D classification.
  • Agreement improved significantly after correcting misclassified surgeon annotations (kappa=0.89).
  • Intraclass correlation for CCI was high between the algorithm and surgeon (0.89) after correction, and moderate with the nurse (0.76).

Conclusions:

  • The developed algorithm shows promising performance for automated grading of surgery-related AEs.
  • Implementation into real-time data with continuous evaluation is motivated to assess impact on AEs.
  • Future work may involve using local EHR data to enhance risk prediction with machine learning techniques.
Abstract