Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
Analysis of postoperative complications in patients undergoing anorectal malformation surgery: are there any
A Hernández Pérez1, P Deltell Collomer1, C Abril Sánchez1
1Pediatric Surgery Department. Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis. Alicante (Spain).
Objective:
To describe our experience with anorectal malformation (ARM) patients, while analyzing complications and risk factors.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective study of ARM patients aged 0-18 years old undergoing surgery from 2006 to 2023 was carried out. Demographic variables, associated malformations, age and repair surgery operating times, presence and type of colostomy, previous intestinal preparation, and presence and type of surgical complications -intestinal occlusion, anal prolapse, stenosis, bleeding, dehiscence, extrusion, anoplasty misposition, urethral perforation, and stomal complications- were collected.
Results:
89 patients were studied. 44 patients were boys and 45 were girls. Median age was 7 years (3-18). Baseline treatment was posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in 61 (69%) patients, and colostomy in 24 (27%) patients (4/24 loop, 1/24 Hartmann, 19/24 divided ends). Median age at PSARP was 5.4 months (5 days-7 years), with a mean operating time of 112 min (38-259). The incidence of complications was 38% (34/89). The most frequent complication was anal prolapse (19%) (1/3 reintervention as a result of pain/bleeding), followed by dehiscence (17%). Statistically significant differences were noted between intestinal preparation (p= 0.001, -1.49 95% CI: -2.69 to -1.24), presence of colostomy (p= 0.05, -2,54 95% CI: -6.5 to -0.987), and age at surgical repair (p= 0.047, 1.198 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.15) with the incidence of complications. The age-complications correlation score was 0.21 (p= 0.046). No differences in terms of operating time (p= 0.073) and type of colostomy (p= 0.81) were observed.
Conclusions:
38% of the patients had complications. Intestinal preparation, presence of colostomy, and age at repair can have an impact on the incidence of complications. The first two could stand as protective factors (RR= -1,49 and -2.54, respectively). Age would increase the risk by 1.2-fold.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...

