Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2025

04:10
Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern
Published on: March 8, 2020
6.1K
Adjustable wind selectivity in shearwaters implies knowledge of the foraging landscape
Stephanie M Harris1, Charles M Bishop2, Sarah Bond3
1School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge LL59 5AB, UK.
Current Biology : CB
|January 15, 2025
Summary
Manx shearwaters dynamically adjust their flight paths to balance energy costs with reaching foraging destinations. They strategically use wind, prioritizing target-driven navigation when returning to the colony or foraging.
Area of Science:
- Animal behavior
- Ecology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Highly mobile animals face complex decisions balancing energy expenditure with resource acquisition.
- Seabirds utilize wind for efficient long-distance travel but also target specific foraging areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how Manx shearwaters make foraging decisions by trading off flight efficiency with navigation to known targets.
- To understand the dynamic adjustments in wind selectivity based on different flight contexts.
Main Methods:
- Tracking over 600 foraging trips of breeding Manx shearwaters (Puffinus puffinus) using GPS accelerometers.
- Analyzing the relationship between wind conditions and flapping effort during flight.
Main Results:
- Manx shearwaters generally exhibit wind selectivity but adjust it based on flight goals.
- Reduced wind selectivity was observed during homing flights, low wind speeds, and longer flight durations, indicating a focus on target-driven navigation.
- Shearwaters appear to balance flight costs with the benefits of traveling to known foraging areas.
Conclusions:
- Animal foraging strategies dynamically optimize the trade-off between efficient travel and accessing known resources.
- Decision-making incorporates prior knowledge of the cost-benefit landscape, extending beyond immediate sensory detection.
Keywords:
Procellariiformesbiologgingcentral place foragingdynamic soaringenergy landscapeflight energeticsforaging behaviourmovement ecologyoptimal foraging theoryseabirdMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
11.9K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.9K
Types of Selection
40.1K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.1K
Mate Choice
8.0K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.0K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection
21.8K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
21.8K
Limits to Natural Selection
31.1K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.1K

