Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perforator Versus Non-perforator Flap for Perineal Reconstruction: Long-Term Comparison of Complications and Quality of Life.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Perforator Versus Non-perforator Flap for Perineal Reconstruction-Long-Term Comparison of Complications and Quality of Life.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Double Lotus Petal Flaps for Large Perianal Defect Reconstruction After Multistage Extramammary Paget Resection.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

A Practical Algorithm for Donor- and Recipient-site Selection in Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer in Extremity Lymphedema.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Exploring the Role of AI in Managing Treatment Recommendations for Lymphedema: International, Multidisciplinary, Multiprofessional Survey Study of Trust, Reliability, and Impact on Decision-Making.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same author

Erratum to "Is there an ideal recipient site preconditioning to improve autologous fat graft retention in breast surgery? A prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial" [J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 113 (2026) 435-444].

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same journal

Microsurgical outcomes of free flaps in patients with sickle cell trait: A case series.

JPRAS open·2026
Same journal

Patient perceptions of postoperative scarring after gender-affirming mastectomy: A cross-sectional study.

JPRAS open·2026
Same journal

Assessing techniques and outcomes in scrotal reconstruction: A sudanese cohort study.

JPRAS open·2026
Same journal

Aesthetic surgery complications in private practice settings: Insights to optimize patient access and outcomes.

JPRAS open·2026
Same journal

Gas subcision with PDLLA (Juvelook): Evaluating a hybrid mechanical-biologic approach for atrophic acne scars.

JPRAS open·2026
Same journal

Freestyle multiple-perforator Island flaps for reconstruction of large dorsolumbar defects: A retrospective case series.

JPRAS open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture
04:58

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture

Published on: September 19, 2015

8.7K

Functional soft palate reconstruction.

Sofia Oetliker-Contin1, Tarek Ismail1, Rik Osinga1,2,3,4,5

  • 1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic, and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

JPRAS Open
|January 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a new dynamic soft palate reconstruction technique using muscle transfer and free flaps. The method effectively restores swallowing and speech functions, minimizing nasal regurgitation and nasalance in oropharyngeal cancer patients.

Keywords:
Digastric muscleFunctional reconstructionOropharyngeal carcinomaSoft palate reconstruction

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating Wound Healing in Mice Models of Oronasal Fistulas
03:51

Author Spotlight: Investigating Wound Healing in Mice Models of Oronasal Fistulas

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.0K
Isolation and Characterization of Satellite Cells from Rat Head Branchiomeric Muscles
07:37

Isolation and Characterization of Satellite Cells from Rat Head Branchiomeric Muscles

Published on: July 20, 2015

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2025

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture
04:58

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture

Published on: September 19, 2015

8.7K
Author Spotlight: Investigating Wound Healing in Mice Models of Oronasal Fistulas
03:51

Author Spotlight: Investigating Wound Healing in Mice Models of Oronasal Fistulas

Published on: September 8, 2023

1.0K
Isolation and Characterization of Satellite Cells from Rat Head Branchiomeric Muscles
07:37

Isolation and Characterization of Satellite Cells from Rat Head Branchiomeric Muscles

Published on: July 20, 2015

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Head and Neck Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Large soft palate defects from oropharyngeal cancer excision can cause significant functional deficits.
  • Static reconstruction methods often lead to velopharyngeal insufficiency, impairing swallowing and speech.
  • Restoring aeromechanical and acoustic functions is crucial for patient quality of life.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a novel dynamic soft palate reconstruction technique.
  • To evaluate the functional outcomes of this technique in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma.
  • To assess improvements in swallowing and speech with reduced nasalance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a dynamic reconstruction using muscle transfer (digastric muscle bellies) and a radial forearm free flap.
  • Conducted an anatomical study to confirm nerve innervation.
  • Retrospectively analyzed eight patients who underwent the procedure between 2007 and 2017.

Main Results:

  • Seven of eight patients achieved satisfactory swallowing function.
  • All patients demonstrated understandable speech with minimal nasalance.
  • The technique proved feasible and effective in functional soft palate reconstruction.

Conclusions:

  • The described surgical approach offers a functional soft palate reconstruction for large defects.
  • Outcomes approach normality, significantly improving swallowing and speech.
  • This dynamic technique is a suitable option for oropharyngeal cancer patients requiring extensive soft palate resection.