Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026
A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling
Published on: September 15, 2017
Comparison of postoperative biochemical indicators and surgical result between partial adrenalectomy and total
Pingchu Li1, Hongjin Shi1, Yanghuang Zheng1
1Department of Urology, Surgical Ward One, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Background:
The selection and extent of application for both total adrenalectomy (TA) and partial adrenalectomy (PA) within this surgical approach continue to be matters of debate. This paper compares the postoperative efficacy and functional indicators of PA and TA to provide comprehensive insights for clinicians to consider the best surgical treatment options.
Methods:
Systematic review on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted. We compared several key factors between TA and PA, including operating time (OT), blood loss, length of hospital stay, serum aldosterone levels, plasma renin activity, postoperative aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, early postoperative complications, and blood potassium concentration. Data were collected by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method, and Review Manager software (RevMan) version 5.3 was used.
Results:
The results showed that compared to TA, PA had a shorter OT [weighted mean difference (WMD) =-12.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): -19.42, -4.89; I2=96%; P=0.001]. Compared with PA, TA had a better recovery of diastolic blood pressure (WMD =2.12; 95% CI: 0.42, 3.81; I2=0%; P=0.01). Regarding serum aldosterone, plasma renin activity, postoperative ARR, systolic blood pressure, early postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and blood potassium, there was no significant difference between PA and TA (P>0.05). In subgroup analysis, results indicated that there was currently no significant difference in most results between PA and TA (P>0.05). For patients aged 50 years or younger, PA had a shorter OT compared to TA (WMD =-19.71; 95% CI: -35.99, -3.42; I2=95%; P=0.02). For tumor size ≤2.0 cm, the intraoperative blood loss of PA was greater than that of TA (WMD =16.76; 95% CI: 3.62, 29.90; I2=37%; P=0.01).
Conclusions:
The OT was shorter in PA than in TA, and shorter in younger patients. The recovery of diastolic blood pressure after TA was better than that of PA. When the tumor was 2 cm or small, TA had less blood loss than PA. There was no significant difference in functional indexes between PA and TA. PA offers advantages in surgical outcomes compared to TA. However, for tumors ≤2 cm, TA may provide greater benefits to patients. Additionally, TA demonstrates superior recovery of diastolic blood pressure compared to PA according to functional indicators.
