Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Comprehensive benefits evaluation of low impact development using scenario analysis and fuzzy decision approach
Ting Ni1,2, Xiaohong Zhang2, Peng Leng3
1Business School, Sichuan University, 610059, Chengdu, China.
This study introduces a novel fuzzy approach to evaluate Low Impact Development (LID) benefits, integrating environmental, economic, and social factors for robust community-level planning. Results highlight specific LID strategies for effective flood mitigation and runoff reduction.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Urban Planning
- Decision Science
Background:
- Evaluating Low Impact Development (LID) benefits using traditional multi-criteria decision-making methods is challenged by uncertainties in hybrid data sources.
- This can lead to inaccurate results and affect the ranking of different LID strategies.
- A robust framework is needed to holistically assess LID benefits at the community level.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present a multi-indicator fuzzy comprehensive benefit evaluation approach for selecting effective LID measures.
- To provide a robust and holistic framework for evaluating LID benefits at the community level, addressing uncertainties in decision-making.
- To identify practical LID implementation priorities for local decision-makers.
Main Methods:
- Integrated quantitative (environmental, economic) and qualitative (social) indicators.
- Employed Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and ArcGIS for scenario-based analysis.
- Utilized hesitant fuzzy language sets and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for decision-making under uncertainty.
- Incorporated hesitant fuzzy weighted average algorithm and multi-return period scenarios (5, 10, 20, 50, 100 years) for enhanced robustness.
Main Results:
- Evaluated 26 LID configurations in Chenglong Road Subdistrict under various rainfall scenarios.
- Identified that LID measures, especially sunken green spaces and permeable paving, significantly reduce runoff and peak flow.
- Demonstrated improved flood mitigation capabilities of selected LID strategies across multiple return periods.
- Results indicate practical implementation priorities for local decision-makers.
Conclusions:
- The proposed hesitant fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach provides a robust framework for selecting LID measures.
- The integration of SWMM, ArcGIS, and fuzzy decision-making methods effectively handles uncertainties in benefit evaluation.
- Selected LID configurations, particularly green spaces and permeable paving, are effective for urban flood mitigation and runoff management.
- The study offers valuable insights for sustainable urban water management and policy development.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Manipulation and Analysis
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Sustainable Development
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
Factorial Design

