Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

635
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
635
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

462
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
462
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

508
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
508
Neural Regulation01:37

Neural Regulation

39.1K
Digestion begins with a cephalic phase that prepares the digestive system to receive food. When our brain processes visual or olfactory information about food, it triggers impulses in the cranial nerves innervating the salivary glands and stomach to prepare for food.
39.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.1K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

105
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
105

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental and simulation studies of strontium/fluoride-codoped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with osteogenic and antibacterial activities.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2019
Same author

Crystalline Anionic Germanate Covalent Organic Framework for High CO<sub>2</sub> Selectivity and Fast Li Ion Conduction.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2019
Same author

Improved methane production and sulfate removal by anaerobic co-digestion corn stalk and levulinic acid wastewater pretreated by calcium hydroxide.

The Science of the total environment·2019
Same author

Prognostic value of TGF-β in lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC cancer·2019
Same author

Proteomic characterization of bovine granulosa cells in dominant and subordinate follicles.

Hereditas·2019
Same author

The Nucleoprotein and Phosphoprotein of Peste des Petits Ruminants Virus Inhibit Interferons Signaling by Blocking the JAK-STAT Pathway.

Viruses·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

494

Federated learning meets Bayesian neural network: Robust and uncertainty-aware distributed variational inference.

Pengfei Li1, Qinghua Hu2, Xiaofei Wang2

  • 1College of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China; School of Intelligence Science and Engineering, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining, 810007, China.

Neural Networks : the Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society
|January 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Federated Learning (FL) with uncertainty-aware Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) improves model robustness and data privacy. This novel FedUAB approach addresses client data limitations and heterogeneity for superior performance in distributed machine learning.

Keywords:
Bayesian neural networkFederated learningUncertaintyVariational inference

More Related Videos

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

494
Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
13:19

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment

Published on: March 13, 2021

9.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Data Privacy

Background:

  • Federated Learning (FL) is widely used for data privacy but struggles with limited client data and heterogeneity, leading to suboptimal aggregated models.
  • Client-side model overfitting and drift are significant challenges in traditional FL frameworks.
  • Existing FL methods often fail to adequately address the complexities of distributed, heterogeneous datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel Federated Learning approach integrating Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) to enhance model robustness and data privacy.
  • To address key challenges in fusing BNNs with FL, including prior selection, weight aggregation, and variance management.
  • To improve performance of both global and personalized models in a simulated FL environment.

Main Methods:

  • Developed FedUAB (FL with uncertainty-aware BNNs), where clients train BNNs using the Bayes by backprop algorithm.
  • Modeled BNN weights as Gaussian distributions to mitigate overfitting and enhance data privacy.
  • Implemented novel methods for prior distribution selection, Gaussian weight aggregation, and variance management.

Main Results:

  • FedUAB demonstrated superior performance over traditional FL and other Bayesian FL methods in simulations.
  • The approach enhanced robustness and mitigated overfitting issues inherent in FL.
  • FedUAB models effectively quantified and decomposed uncertainties, providing valuable insights.

Conclusions:

  • The FedUAB approach offers a robust solution for privacy-preserving distributed machine learning by integrating uncertainty-aware BNNs.
  • This method effectively tackles data limitations and heterogeneity challenges in FL.
  • FedUAB provides enhanced performance and uncertainty quantification capabilities for FL systems.