Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

10:39
The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
Published on: May 3, 2018
8.4K
Auditory Cues and Feedback in the Serial Reaction Time Task: Evidence for Sequence Acquisition and Sensory Transfer
Elena M Broeckelmann1, Toby Martin2, Cheryl M Glazebrook1
1Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Journal of Motor Behavior
|January 19, 2025
Summary
Auditory cues in the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) improved sequence learning maintenance, but neither auditory cues nor feedback enhanced overall learning compared to no sound. All groups acquired similar implicit motor sequence knowledge.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Motor sequence learning is crucial for daily activities.
- The role of auditory stimuli in enhancing motor learning remains under investigation.
- Previous research suggests multisensory integration may benefit learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether auditory cueing or auditory feedback benefits visual sequence learning similarly.
- To determine if auditory stimuli improve performance maintenance and transfer in the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT).
- To assess the impact of auditory conditions on implicit motor sequence knowledge acquisition.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-three neurotypical adults completed a visual Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT).
- Participants were assigned to auditory cueing (AC), auditory feedback (AF), or no sound (NS) groups.
- Learning was assessed via Total Sequence Time (TST) and Total Error (TE), with retention and transfer tests after 48 hours.
Main Results:
- A significant group-by-time interaction showed only the auditory cueing group maintained performance improvements when the sequence was perturbed.
- All groups acquired equivalent implicit motor sequence knowledge, performing best in the no-sound condition on Day 2.
- No speed-accuracy tradeoff was observed, with consistent improvements in TST across groups.
Conclusions:
- Auditory cueing aids in maintaining motor sequence performance under challenging conditions.
- Auditory stimuli do not appear to offer a significant advantage for overall implicit motor sequence learning compared to a no-sound condition.
- Performance is robust across sensory conditions, suggesting effective implicit learning regardless of auditory input.

