Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management01:29

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

64
Diagnosing and managing appendicitis requires a structured and comprehensive approach that spans from initial assessment to postoperative care. Here is an overview of the process:
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
64

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of small intestinal atresia and Hirschsprung disease in a multi-institutional colorectal registry.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same author

Large-Volume Pneumoperitoneum in a Neonate: A Rare Case of Necrotizing Gastritis.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Firearm Injuries: Unveiling the Unmatched Healthcare Burden and Costs.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2025
Same author

Increasing surgical healthcare utilization for infants with congenital anomalies in Texas.

Frontiers in surgery·2025
Same author

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for Neonates with Respiratory Failure Referred for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator (ECMO) Support.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A Modified Delphi Study to Build Consensus on Pediatric-Specific Trauma Quality Indicators.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

325

Using NSQIP to improve perforated appendicitis protocol and better resource allocation.

Bailey K Roberts1, Dailen Alonso2, Kristy Terp2

  • 1Northwell Health, Department of Surgery, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.

Surgery in Practice and Science
|January 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) effectively highlights quality improvement areas but needs supplementary review for comprehensive institutional practice evaluation. Continuous protocol assessment and resource consideration are key for enhancing patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Indocyanine Green-Guided Intraoperative Imaging to Facilitate Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement for Treating Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
04:01

Indocyanine Green-Guided Intraoperative Imaging to Facilitate Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement for Treating Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Published on: September 8, 2022

2.4K
Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure
07:29

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure

Published on: August 14, 2017

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

325
Indocyanine Green-Guided Intraoperative Imaging to Facilitate Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement for Treating Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
04:01

Indocyanine Green-Guided Intraoperative Imaging to Facilitate Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement for Treating Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Published on: September 8, 2022

2.4K
Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure
07:29

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure

Published on: August 14, 2017

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Quality Improvement
  • Patient Outcomes

Background:

  • The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is a widely utilized database for assessing surgical quality.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness and limitations of NSQIP in driving meaningful clinical improvements is essential.
  • Understanding the scope of NSQIP is crucial for healthcare institutions aiming to optimize patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of NSQIP as a tool for identifying areas for quality improvement in surgical practices.
  • To determine the sufficiency of NSQIP data for a comprehensive assessment of institutional surgical practices.
  • To highlight the importance of supplemental reviews and protocol adjustments for sustained patient outcome benefits.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of NSQIP data utilization for quality improvement initiatives.
  • Assessment of NSQIP's limitations in providing a complete picture of institutional performance.
  • Review of the impact of protocol evaluation and resource utilization on patient outcomes.

Main Results:

  • NSQIP serves as a valuable tool for directing attention toward specific areas needing quality enhancement.
  • NSQIP alone is insufficient for a thorough evaluation of institutional practices, necessitating additional review methods.
  • Continuous evaluation and adaptation of protocols are vital for realizing ongoing benefits in patient outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • NSQIP is a beneficial starting point for quality improvement but requires supplementation for comprehensive institutional assessment.
  • Integrating supplemental reviews and considering resource utilization alongside NSQIP data can lead to more robust quality improvement strategies.
  • Regularly evaluating and adjusting clinical protocols is imperative for maximizing positive impacts on patient outcomes.