Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Optokinetic Response As Structural and Functional Visual System Readouts in Mice and Rats
Published on: January 10, 2019
Evaluation of Tele-Education in Malawi for Detection of Macular Features Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Thokozani Zungu1,2, Shaffi Mdala1,2, Halima Sumayya Twabi3
1Ophthalmology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Purpose:
The study aimed to assess the reliability of tele-education in training a Malawian ophthalmology resident to interpret optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of patients with macular conditions.
Methods:
This was a retrospective analysis of 1000 macula-centered OCT image series from 1000 eyes of 1000 consecutive patients from Malawi, which involved initial interpretation by a German retina specialist (observer 1) (T0). Observer 1 then trained a Malawian resident (observer 2) via email, and observer 2 independently interpreted images at T1, followed by face-to-face training in Malawi and reinterpretation at T2 and T3 (3-month intervals). The observers had to recognize, on OCT imaging, the normal macular structure, vitreofoveal traction (VFT), absent fovea depression (FD), epiretinal membrane (ERM), lamellar macular hole (LMH), full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), foveoschisis, intraretinal pseudocyst (IPC), intraretinal hyperreflective foci (IHF), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), and drusen. Cohen's Kappa statistic measured inter-observer agreement.
Results:
At T1 post-tele-education, almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86; 99.6% agreement) was observed for FTMH. Agreement remained high at T2 post-face-to-face training (κ = 0.9; 99.7%) and decreased substantially at T3 (κ = 0.77; 99.4%). Following tele-education (T1), substantial agreement (κ range: 0.77 - 0.86) was found for IPC, PED, IHF, and FD, while ERM showed fair agreement (κ = 0.33; 81%). Face-to-face training notably improved agreement for SRF (T1 κ = 0.6, T2 κ = 0.63), LMH (T1 κ = 0.6, T2 κ = 0.67), and normal macular structure (T1 κ = 0.6, T2 κ = 0.62).
Conclusion:
There was good agreement in the detection of the majority of the OCT features seen in most of the macular pathologies following training through tele-education and the results did not change significantly following face-to-face teaching. Tele-education could reliably complement training in vitreoretinal diagnostic skills in resource-limited settings.
More Related Videos
07:18Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
07:44In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020