Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
ACCREDIT: Validation of clinical score for progression of COVID-19 while hospitalized
Vinicius Lins Costa Ok Melo1, Pedro Emmanuel Alvarenga Americano do Brasil1
1Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil.
Abstract:
COVID-19 is no longer a global health emergency, but it remains challenging to predict its prognosis.
Objective:
To develop and validate an instrument to predict COVID-19 progression for critically ill hospitalized patients in a Brazilian population.
Methodology:
Observational study with retrospective follow-up. Participants were consecutively enrolled for treatment in non-critical units between January 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. They were included if they were adults, with a positive RT-PCR result, history of exposure, or clinical or radiological image findings compatible with COVID-19. The outcome was characterized as either transfer to critical care or death. Predictors such as demographic, clinical, comorbidities, laboratory, and imaging data were collected at hospitalization. A logistic model with lasso or elastic net regularization, a random forest classification model, and a random forest regression model were developed and validated to estimate the risk of disease progression.
Results:
Out of 301 individuals, the outcome was 41.8 %. The majority of the patients in the study lacked a COVID-19 vaccination. Diabetes mellitus and systemic arterial hypertension were the most common comorbidities. After model development and cross-validation, the Random Forest regression was considered the best approach, and the following eight predictors were retained: D-dimer, Urea, Charlson comorbidity index, pulse oximetry, respiratory frequency, Lactic Dehydrogenase, RDW, and Radiologic RALE score. The model's bias-corrected intercept and slope were - 0.0004 and 1.079 respectively, the average prediction error was 0.028. The ROC AUC curve was 0.795, and the variance explained was 0.289.
Conclusion:
The prognostic model was considered good enough to be recommended for clinical use in patients during hospitalization (https://pedrobrasil.shinyapps.io/INDWELL/). The clinical benefit and the performance in different scenarios are yet to be known.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
06:52Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include: