Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

803
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
803
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.8K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.8K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endogenous precision of the number sense.

eLife·2026
Same author

Individual differences in information demand have a low dimensional structure predicted by some curiosity traits.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Robust variability of grid cell properties within individual grid modules enhances encoding of local space.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Imprecise probabilistic inference from sequential data.

Psychological review·2024
Same author

A unifying theory explains seemingly contradictory biases in perceptual estimation.

Nature neuroscience·2024
Same author

Individual risk attitudes arise from noise in neurocognitive magnitude representations.

Nature human behaviour·2023
Same journal

Tau protein as a regulator of mitochondrial function and dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A scalable, dividing cell model for the robust propagation and quantification of human sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal BMP signaling directs postnatal organ innervation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Single-shot wide-field biochemical imaging at 1 kHz frame rate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Morphogenesis and topological evolution of a frustrated nematic liquid crystal under confinement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

B cell-intrinsic CXCR3 drives efficient generation of ectopic pulmonary germinal center responses to influenza A virus infection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K

Representational geometry explains puzzling error distributions in behavioral tasks.

Xue-Xin Wei1,2,3,4,5, Michael Woodford6

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|January 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive error distributions in behavioral tasks are not always Gaussian, even with simple noise. Neural manifold geometry, not just noise, dictates error shapes, impacting working memory models.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelbehavioral errorneural manifoldrepresentational geometryworking memory

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding errors in behavioral tasks is key to cognitive research.
  • Previous work assumed Gaussian error distributions for continuous variables in working memory.
  • Deviations from normality were linked to complex noise sources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reassess the assumption of Gaussian error distributions in behavioral tasks.
  • To investigate the relationship between encoding manifold geometry and error distribution shape.
  • To apply a new theoretical framework to visual short-term memory (VSTM) data.

Main Methods:

  • Developed ideal observer models with Gaussian encoding noise.
  • Analyzed the geometrical structure of the encoding manifold.
  • Applied the derived theory to experimental data from visual short-term memory tasks.

Main Results:

  • Error distributions are generally non-Gaussian, even with Gaussian encoding noise.
  • The geometry of the encoding manifold determines error distribution shape, often resulting in flat tails for high-dimensional geometries.
  • The proposed theory explains a wide range of VSTM data with only two parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Challenges the conventional view of working memory mechanisms and capacity.
  • Suggests the Bayesian framework effectively explains working memory, similar to perception.
  • Highlights the critical, underappreciated role of representational geometry in human behavioral errors.