Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

16:23
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
15.0K
Endogenous precision of the number sense
Arthur Prat-Carrabin1, Michael Woodford1
1Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Elife
|April 15, 2026
Summary
Brain representations are imprecise, with
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
- Psychophysics
Background:
- Behavioral variability and neural stochasticity indicate imprecise brain representations.
- Numerosity studies suggest an imprecise 'number sense', potentially reflecting optimal resource allocation.
- Efficient-coding models propose that representational imprecision depends on elicitation context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how representational imprecision scales with contextual factors.
- To determine if imprecision in numerosity perception is context-dependent.
- To elucidate the relationship between task demands, prior distributions, and perceptual precision.
Main Methods:
- Subjects performed numerosity estimation and discrimination tasks.
- The width of the prior distribution for number sampling was manipulated.
- Behavioral data were analyzed to quantify imprecision and its dependence on prior width and task type.
Main Results:
- Imprecision increased sublinearly with the prior distribution width across both tasks.
- The relationship between imprecision and prior width differed significantly between estimation and discrimination tasks.
- This double dependence suggests a resource constraint optimized for task-specific rewards.
Conclusions:
- Perceptual noise is endogenously determined, not solely external.
- Representational precision is dynamically modulated by both environmental context (prior distribution) and task objectives.
- The brain optimizes a trade-off between representational accuracy and neural resource costs.
Related Concept Videos
Rules for Significant Figures
42.2K
In any measurement, the precision of the measuring tool is an essential factor. An ordinary ruler, for example, can measure length to the closest millimeter; a caliper, on the other hand, can measure length to the nearest 0.01 mm. As a result, the caliper is a more precise measurement tool because it can measure extremely minute changes in length. The measurements will be more accurate if the measuring tool is more precise.
It should be emphasized that when we represent measured values, the...
It should be emphasized that when we represent measured values, the...
42.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures
87.3K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
87.3K
Real Number Operations
479
The concept of real numbers includes all the values that can be represented on a continuous number line. The system began with basic counting values used for enumeration. It later expanded to include values that represent the absence of quantity and opposites of the counting values. When situations required expressing parts of a whole or dividing quantities evenly, values capable of representing such proportions were developed. When written using decimal notation, these values can end or repeat...
479
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
55.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.9K
Accuracy and Precision
17.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
17.7K

