Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cloning Techniques for Full-Length DNA Fragments
Published on: May 17, 2024
Concurrent but consecutive vaccination of modified live PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 provides better protection in nursery
Yashavanth Shaan Lakshmanappa1, Pengcheng Shang2, Sankar Renu1
1Center for Food Animal Health (CFAH), Department of Animal Sciences, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, United States.
Abstract:
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus is a severe threat to the global swine industry. Modified live virus vaccines (MLVs) for two PRRSV species (PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2) are the most widely used approach to control PRRSV-caused diseases. For swine herds influenced by PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2, how to rationalize MLV immunization strategies for robust and cross-protective immune responses has been a long-lasting need. In this study, we found that the replication of PRRSV-1 is strongly suppressed by co-infection with PRRSV-2 in vitro, especially under concurrent co-infection conditions. We compared the adaptive immune responses between consecutive and concurrent vaccination methods in nursery pigs, vaccinated either 3 days apart (PRRSV-1 MLV followed by PRRSV-2 MLV, consecutive) or together on the same day (concurrent). PRRSV-1 RNAs were mainly detectable in the sera of consecutively vaccinated pigs. In contrast, PRRSV-2 RNAs in sera were not changed in both vaccination strategies. After the homologous PRRSV-1 or PRRSV-2 challenge, we found that consecutive vaccination slightly improved PRRSV-1 viremia clearance and did not attenuate the PRRSV-2 viremia clearance. Both vaccination strategies induced comparable T-helper cell responses against PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 in peripheral blood before and after the challenge. Interestingly, consecutive vaccination induced significantly higher PRRSV-1-specific post-challenge T-helper and cytotoxic T cells responses in the tracheobronchial lymph nodes than concurrent vaccination. Furthermore, consecutive vaccination significantly improved neutralizing antibody responses against PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 in comparison with concurrent vaccination. In conclusion, consecutive vaccination appears to be better for viral clearance and induction of adaptive immune response, and our study provides a preliminary rationale to optimize PRRS MLV immunization strategy for better dual protection.
More Related Videos
08:13Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination
Published on: January 20, 2019
09:13Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
Published on: November 1, 2011