Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Tissue Homogenization and Cell Lysis01:32

Tissue Homogenization and Cell Lysis

7.4K
Tissue homogenization involves disintegrating tissue architecture and lysing cells, and is an early step in isolating and analyzing cellular components. The method used for homogenization depends on the sample type, the amount of sample available, the analyte to be obtained, and the sensitivity of the method. These methods are broadly classified as mechanical and non-mechanical methods.
Mechanical methods of tissue homogenization
These methods rely on applying external physical force to disrupt...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Ink to Mockup: An Integrated Study of Historical Gall Ink Formulations and Their Impact on Paper.

ChemPlusChem·2026
Same author

Evaluating Environmental Performance of PLA-Cellulose-Based Biocomposites: A Comprehensive Study on Biodegradability, Compostability, and Ecotoxicity.

Polymers·2025
Same author

<i>Cochlospermum angolense</i> Welw ex Oliv: Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant Activity, and Therapeutic Prospects.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Mechanical Behaviour of Green Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Sheep and Dog Wool from Serra Da Estrela.

Polymers·2024
Same author

Viability Study of Serra da Estrela Dog Wool to Produce Green Composites.

Polymers·2024
Same author

Production and Characterization of k-Carrageenan Films Incorporating

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

Correction: Yang et al. Microstructural Characteristics of High-Pressure Die Casting with High Strength-Ductility Synergy Properties: A Review. <i>Materials</i> 2023, <i>16</i>, 1954.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Effect of La and Ce Microalloying on the Corrosion Resistance of 0.4Sb Low-Alloy Steel in a Harsh Marine Atmospheric Environment.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

High-Temperature Properties of Magnesium Ammonium Phosphate Cement Modified with Gold Tailings.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

A Study on the Evolution of Intermetallic Phase Microstructure and High-Temperature Creep Behavior in Mg-8.0Al-1.0Nd-1.5Gd-Mn Alloys.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Material-Driven Clinical Complications in Mechanical Circulatory Support: From Blood-Material Interactions to Device-Related Adverse Events.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Influence of Final Irrigation on Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubular Penetration: A Systematic Review.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2025

Biomechanical Characterization of Human Soft Tissues Using Indentation and Tensile Testing
07:07

Biomechanical Characterization of Human Soft Tissues Using Indentation and Tensile Testing

Published on: December 13, 2016

31.4K

Tissue Paper Softness: A Comparison Between Different Experimental Assessment Approaches.

António de O Mendes1, Joana C Vieira1, Ana M Carta2

  • 1Fiber Materials and Environmental Technologies Research Unit (FibEnTech-UBI), University da Beira Interior, R. Marquês D'Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared four methods for measuring tissue paper softness, including the Tissue Softness Analyzer (TSA) and Kawabata Evaluation System (KES). Ranking analysis revealed differences in method concordance, highlighting unique tissue paper characteristics.

Keywords:
Kawabata evaluation systemoptical systemsoftnesssubjective evaluationtissue papertissue softness analyzer

More Related Videos

Measurement of Aggregate Cohesion by Tissue Surface Tensiometry
12:49

Measurement of Aggregate Cohesion by Tissue Surface Tensiometry

Published on: April 8, 2011

12.5K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2025

Biomechanical Characterization of Human Soft Tissues Using Indentation and Tensile Testing
07:07

Biomechanical Characterization of Human Soft Tissues Using Indentation and Tensile Testing

Published on: December 13, 2016

31.4K
Measurement of Aggregate Cohesion by Tissue Surface Tensiometry
12:49

Measurement of Aggregate Cohesion by Tissue Surface Tensiometry

Published on: April 8, 2011

12.5K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Textile Engineering
  • Consumer Product Testing

Background:

  • Assessing tissue paper softness is crucial for product quality and consumer satisfaction.
  • Standardized and comparative methods are needed to objectively evaluate tactile properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the concordance of four distinct methods for evaluating tissue paper softness.
  • To identify the most and least consistent methods for softness assessment.
  • To highlight tissue paper products with unique softness characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized four assessment approaches: Tissue Softness Analyzer (TSA), Subjective Evaluation (SUB), Kawabata Evaluation System (KES), and an Optical System (OPT).
  • Evaluated a diverse set of 29 different tissue paper products.
  • Developed a ranking-based comparison procedure to analyze method concordance independent of absolute values.

Main Results:

  • The ranking comparison effectively differentiated the four assessment methods.
  • Identified varying degrees of concordance among the TSA, SUB, KES, and OPT systems.
  • Discovered specific tissue paper products exhibiting distinctive characteristics that stood out across methods.

Conclusions:

  • The implemented ranking procedure provides valuable insights into the comparative performance of softness evaluation methods.
  • Understanding method concordance is essential for selecting the most appropriate technique for tissue paper softness assessment.
  • The study successfully identified unique tissue paper products based on their softness profiles.