Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

09:49
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
14.1K
An Investigation of the Domain Gap in CLIP-Based Person Re-Identification
Andrea Asperti1, Leonardo Naldi1, Salvatore Fiorilla1
1Department of Informatics-Science and Engineering (DISI), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 25, 2025
Summary
CLIP-based models show promise for person re-identification (re-id) by reducing the domain gap. Enhancing training data and using random erasing improved performance significantly.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Person re-identification (re-id) is crucial for intelligent surveillance.
- The domain gap, or performance drop on unseen data, hinders re-id systems.
- CLIP-based models offer potential for domain generalization via multimodal pre-training.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively analyze the domain gap in CLIP-based re-id systems.
- To evaluate CLIP's effectiveness in mitigating domain shift compared to image encoders.
- To assess the impact of data augmentation and extended training on re-id robustness.
Main Methods:
- Systematic performance evaluation of CLIP-based re-id models on standard benchmarks (Market-1501, DukeMTMC-reID, MSMT17, Airport).
- Measurement of mean average precision (mAP) and Rank-1 accuracy.
- Analysis of CLIP's visual-textual alignment benefits and comparison with image encoder baselines.
- Evaluation of training set expansion and random erasing augmentation.
Main Results:
- CLIP's visual-textual alignment offers advantages in person re-identification.
- Extending training data and using random erasing improved mAP by +4.3% and Rank-1 accuracy by +4.0% on average.
- The study quantifies the domain gap challenges in real-world re-id scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Standardized benchmarks and systematic evaluations are vital for reproducible re-id research.
- CLIP-based approaches show potential for improving model robustness and generalization in diverse surveillance applications.
- This work provides insights into mitigating domain gap issues in person re-identification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
5.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
5.8K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
5.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.6K

