Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
Published on: February 9, 2024
Combining a Standardized Growth Class Assessment, UAV Sensor Data, GIS Processing, and Machine Learning
Ronald P Dillner1, Maria A Wimmer2, Matthias Porten1
1Department of Viticulture and Oenology, DLR (Dienstleistungszentrum Ländlicher Raum) Mosel/Steillagenzentrum, Gartenstraße 18, 54470 Bernkastel-Kues, Germany.
Abstract:
Assessing vines' vigour is essential for vineyard management and automatization of viticulture machines, including shaking adjustments of berry harvesters during grape harvest or leaf pruning applications. To address these problems, based on a standardized growth class assessment, labeled ground truth data of precisely located grapevines were predicted with specifically selected Machine Learning (ML) classifiers (Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Support Vector Machines (SVM)), utilizing multispectral UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) sensor data. The input features for ML model training comprise spectral, structural, and texture feature types generated from multispectral orthomosaics (spectral features), Digital Terrain and Surface Models (DTM/DSM- structural features), and Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) calculations (texture features). The specific features were selected based on extensive literature research, including especially the fields of precision agri- and viticulture. To integrate only vine canopy-exclusive features into ML classifications, different feature types were extracted and spatially aggregated (zonal statistics), based on a combined pixel- and object-based image-segmentation-technique-created vine row mask around each single grapevine position. The extracted canopy features were progressively grouped into seven input feature groups for model training. Model overall performance metrics were optimized with grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and repeated-k-fold-cross-validation. Finally, ML-based growth class prediction results were extensively discussed and evaluated for overall (accuracy, f1-weighted) and growth class specific- classification metrics (accuracy, user- and producer accuracy).
More Related Videos
13:02The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
Published on: October 5, 2016
10:40Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine
Published on: December 22, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Light Acquisition
Classification of Systems-II
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
GIS Software, Hardware, and Sources of GIS Data