Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

05:59
Nasal Wipes for Influenza A Virus Detection and Isolation from Swine
Published on: December 4, 2015
9.4K
Optimizing Tongue Fluid Sampling and Testing Protocols for Enhanced PRRSV Isolation from Perinatal Swine Mortalities
Onyekachukwu Henry Osemeke1, Isadora Machado1, Elisa De Conti1
1Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3619, USA.
Viruses
|January 25, 2025
Summary
Tongue fluid from dead piglets can be used for Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) isolation. The phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) method yielded the highest virus isolation success rate, particularly with ZMAC cell lines.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Virology
- Swine Disease Diagnostics
Background:
- Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) poses significant economic and health challenges to the global swine industry.
- Effective PRRSV isolation is critical for disease surveillance, outbreak investigation, and the development of targeted vaccines and control strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of tongue fluid (TF) collected from perinatal piglet mortalities as a source for PRRSV isolation.
- To compare different TF collection protocols and assess the suitability of various cell lines for PRRSV isolation.
Main Methods:
- Four tongue fluid collection methods were tested: phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), virus transportation medium (VTM), freeze-thaw, and tissue homogenates.
- PRRSV isolation was attempted using two cell lines (ZMAC, MARC-145) and primary alveolar macrophages (PAM).
- RT-qPCR was used to assess viral RNA load, and virus isolation (VI) success rates were determined for each method and cell line.
Main Results:
- The PBS collection protocol demonstrated the highest virus isolation success rate (22.6%), followed by the VTM group (12.1%). Freeze-thaw and homogenate methods showed significantly lower success rates (2.8% each).
- The ZMAC cell line yielded the highest PRRSV isolation rate (21.0%) compared to MARC-145 (3.1%) and PAM cells (4.8%).
- Mean RT-qPCR Ct values were lowest for the PBS and VTM groups, indicating higher viral RNA concentrations.
Conclusions:
- Tongue fluid from perinatal piglet mortalities is a viable alternative sample source for PRRSV virus isolation.
- The PBS collection method combined with the ZMAC cell line appears most effective for maximizing PRRSV isolation from this sample type.
- This approach can support PRRSV monitoring and control efforts in swine populations.

