Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
Published on: September 8, 2021
Bayesian method for comparing F1 scores in the absence of a gold standard
Jun Tamura1, Yusuke Saigusa1, Junichi Fujita2
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Abstract:
In the field of medicine, evaluating the diagnostic performance of new diagnostic methods can be challenging, especially in the absence of a gold standard. This study proposes a methodology for assessing the performance of diagnostic tests by estimating the posterior distribution of the score using latent class analysis, without relying on a gold standard. The proposed method utilizes Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to estimate the posterior distribution of the score, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic test methods. By applying this method to internet addiction, we demonstrate how latent class analysis can be effectively used to assess diagnostic performance, offering a practical solution for situations where no gold standard is available. The effectiveness of the proposed approach was evaluated through simulation studies by examining the coverage probability of the 95% highest density interval of the estimated posterior distributions.
Related Concept Videos
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
F Distribution
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

