Muscle contributions to propelling the body upward differ between skipping and running

Skipping represents a training alternative to running due to its lower knee contact forces and higher whole-body metabolic cost. The increased metabolic cost of skipping is associated with a higher vertical center-of-mass (COM) displacement during the support and flight phases of the skipping hop compared to running. However, skipping has lower muscle force impulses than running. Therefore, the study purpose was to compare the flow of mechanical power between body segments during skipping and running to determine the mechanisms enabling higher vertical displacement in skipping despite the lower vertical impulse. Running and skipping cycles were simulated in OpenSim for 5 adults (22.4 ± 2.2 y) using motion capture data collected at 2.5 m/s on an instrumented dual-belt treadmill. A segmental power analysis quantified muscle contributions to vertical body segment mechanical power, which were integrated over the stance phase of running (Run) and the hop (Skip 1) and step (Skip 2) of skipping to calculate mechanical work. Higher vertical work was done by the gluteus maximus, vasti, and soleus in Skip 1, primarily through power generation to the trunk, compared to power absorption in Run and Skip 2. Thus, despite lower muscle force impulses in Skip 1, muscles generate power through concentric contractions, leading to greater metabolic cost than in running. These muscle force impulses contribute to propelling the COM upward in Skip 1 (rather than decelerating downward COM motion in Run and Skip 2), which raises the COM and contributes to the greater COM displacement in skipping compared to running.