Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Design and Validation of a High-Fidelity Left Atrial Cardiac Simulator for the Study and Advancement of Left Atrial
Keegan Mendez1,2, Manisha Singh1, Patrick Willoughby3
1Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, Cambridge, USA.
Purpose:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic cardiac arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke, primarily due to thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices offer an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention. However, the complex and variable anatomy of the LAA presents significant challenges to device design and deployment. Current benchtop models fail to replicate both anatomical variability and physiological hemodynamics, limiting their utility. This study introduces a novel left atrial cardiac simulator that incorporates patient-derived LAA models within a benchtop circulatory flow loop, enabling high-fidelity LAAO device testing and development.
Methods:
A rigid, patient-derived left atrium (LA) model was 3D printed from segmented MRI data and modified to accommodate attachment of patient-specific LAA models. A library of LAA geometries was fabricated using silicone casting techniques to replicate the mechanical properties of native tissue. The LA-LAA model was integrated into a circulatory flow loop equipped with a pulsatile pump, pressure sensors, and flow probes, allowing real-time hemodynamic analysis. System tunability was demonstrated by varying heart rate, stroke volume, resistance, and compliance to simulate physiological and pathological conditions.
Results:
The simulator accurately replicated LA pressure and flow waveforms, closely approximating physiological conditions. Changes in heart rate, stroke volume, and compliance effectively modulated LAP and LA inflow before and after LAAO. Distinct pressure and flow waveforms were observed with different LAA geometries. Hemodynamic analysis revealed increased left atrial pulse pressure after occlusion, with the greatest increase occurring after complete exclusion of the LAA. The simulator facilitated the evaluation of LAAO device performance, including metrics such as seal and PDL, and served as an effective training tool for iterative device deployment and recapture with visual and imaging-guided feedback.
Conclusions:
The left atrial cardiac simulator offers a highly tunable and realistic platform for testing and developing LAAO devices. It also serves as an effective procedural training tool, allowing for the simulation of patient-specific anatomical and hemodynamic conditions. By enabling these advanced simulations, the simulator enhances pre-procedural planning, device sizing, and placement. This innovation represents a significant step toward advancing personalized medicine in atrial fibrillation management and improving LAAO outcomes.
