Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

86
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
86
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

114
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
114
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

115
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
115
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

99
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
99
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

58
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
58
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

79
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
79

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counting sheep: Louis Pasteur and the first registered public vaccine trial.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Measurement variability of radiologists when measuring brain tumors.

European journal of radiology·2024
Same author

An evaluation of mindful clinical congruence in medical students after course-based teaching.

Canadian medical education journal·2024
Same author

Deaths averted: An unbiased alternative to rate ratios for measuring the performance of cancer screening programs.

Journal of medical screening·2023
Same author

Colonoscopy Screening and Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.

The New England journal of medicine·2023
Same author

The (Im)precision of Life Expectancy Numbers.

American journal of public health·2022
Same journal

Different risks, same causes: educational attainment influences when, not from what, we die.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Loneliness around the world: patterns, predictors, and well-being implications.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort profile: Swiss personalized health network cohort consortium.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

The SINTER study: a recall-by-genotype design with multidimensional musculoskeletal phenotyping across internal-medicine outpatient clinics.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

SARS-CoV-2 infection as a trigger of type 2 diabetes in adults: a population-based cohort study in Sweden using a double negative control design.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort profile: transformative research on equity and social determinants to uplift resilience and empower LGBTQ+ health in China (TREASURE).

European journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Risks and rates, and the mathematical link between them.

James A Hanley1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada. james.hanley@McGill.CA.

European Journal of Epidemiology
|January 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding survival analysis risk is simplified. This study offers an intuitive heuristic approach to calculating risk over time, moving beyond complex mathematical derivations for broader comprehension.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • The relationship between cumulative incidence and the integrated hazard rate is fundamental in survival analysis.
  • Existing textbook derivations for this relationship are often highly mathematical and lack intuitive explanations.
  • A conceptual understanding is needed to bridge the gap between mathematical formulas and practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an intuitive heuristic derivation of the relationship between cumulative risk and the integrated hazard rate (or incidence density).
  • To connect modern survival analysis concepts to historical actuarial definitions, specifically Edmonds' person-year.
  • To reframe the Nelson-Aalen risk estimator within a dynamic population context.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of mortality definitions and the concept of the person-year.
  • Development of a heuristic approach based on population dynamics and replacements.
  • Conceptual re-interpretation of the Nelson-Aalen estimator using a dynamic population model.

Main Results:

  • A novel, intuitive heuristic derivation for calculating risk over a time span is presented.
  • The historical concept of the person-year is shown to provide a foundation for understanding cumulative risk.
  • The Nelson-Aalen estimator is demonstrated to be a scaled representation of risk within a dynamic population framework.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers a more accessible understanding of fundamental survival analysis principles.
  • Connecting historical actuarial science with modern biostatistics enhances conceptual clarity.
  • This heuristic approach can aid in teaching and applying survival analysis methods.