Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
Published on: June 7, 2017
Prospective, crossover, comparative study of two methods of chlorhexidine bathing
Richard Jordan Hankins1, Luke Handke2, Paul D Fey2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Daily bathing intensive care unit (ICU) patients with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) cloths significantly reduced skin microbial colonization. The 2% CHG cloths demonstrated greater efficacy compared to the 4% CHG solution.
Area of Science:
- Infection control in intensive care units (ICUs)
- Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)
- Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) prevention strategies
Background:
- Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing of intensive care unit (ICU) patients is established to decrease healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).
- The optimal method for CHG bathing in ICUs has not been definitively determined.
- This study addresses the need for evidence-based guidelines on CHG bathing protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of 2% CHG-impregnated cloths versus 4% CHG solution for daily patient bathing in ICUs.
- To evaluate the impact of different CHG bathing methods on skin microbial colonization and CHG skin concentration.
- To assess healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), adverse reactions, and skin tolerability associated with each CHG bathing method.
Main Methods:
- A prospective crossover study design was employed, involving two ICUs.
- Units alternated between using 2% CHG cloths and 4% CHG solution for daily patient bathing in two phases.
- Skin swabs were collected to quantify microbial colonization and CHG concentration, alongside monitoring for HAIs and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Both 2% CHG cloths and 4% CHG solution significantly reduced microbial skin colonization compared to no CHG bath (P < .001).
- The 2% CHG cloths resulted in significantly lower microbial colonization (691 CFU/cm²) and higher CHG skin concentration (1300.4 ppm) compared to the 4% CHG solution (1627 CFU/cm² and 307.2 ppm).
- Both bathing methods were well-tolerated, with no significant difference in HAI rates observed between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Daily bathing with either 2% CHG cloths or 4% CHG solution effectively decreases microbial skin colonization in ICU patients.
- The 2% CHG cloths demonstrated superior performance, achieving greater CHG skin concentration and a more significant reduction in microbial load.
- These findings support the use of 2% CHG cloths as an effective method for CHG bathing in ICUs to reduce microbial colonization.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail...

