Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel framework for improving learning outcomes
Wali Khan Monib1, Atika Qazi1,2, Rosyzie Anna Apong3
1Centre for Lifelong Learning, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE 1410, Brunei Darussalam.
Abstract:
Microlearning has become increasingly popular not only in education sector but also in corporate sector in recent years. However, its definition and didactics conceptualization, integration into instruction design, and effects on learning outcomes remain largely underexplored in terms of synthesized findings. Consequently, challenges persist in clarifying microlearning definition, and didactics, and designing effective microlearning instruction to yield improved learning outcomes. To address these gaps, we analyzed 40 relevant studies following PRISMA guidelines. Based on the findings, we maintain that microlearning is an instructional approach that delivers targeted, action-oriented, bite-sized content to achieve specific objectives within a short period, typically within a few seconds or minutes. The most important findings from the reviewed studies indicate that microlearning has positive impact on learning outcomes. The key learning outcomes identified, categorized according to Bloom's Taxonomy, include cognitive (knowledge acquisition, retention, improvement, recall, transfer, and application as well as critical thinking, problem-solving, professional, feedback and self-regulation skills, core competencies such as digital and pedagogical competence, and performance like test performance), behavioural (presentation skills development, task or work performance, higher completion rates, behavioural patterns, engagement, and collaboration), and affective (positive perceptions and attitudes, increased motivation, satisfaction, and improved self-efficacy). Based on Andragogy in Practice Model, Bloom's Taxonomy, and Sweller's CLT, we proposed a novel microlearning instructional design framework consisting of three integral components-differences consisting of individual, situational, and subject differences; guiding principles including specific-objective, bite-sized content, appropriate timeframe, interactive and engaging content, personalization, and selecting appropriate delivery medium and mode; and learning outcomes (cognitive, behavioural and affective). The proposed framework aims to integrate microlearning into instruction to improve learning outcomes. Educators, instruction designers, and policymakers can use the framework to design microlearning instruction to improve learning outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:43Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
Published on: June 10, 2021
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Introduction to Learning
In contrast to learned behaviors, unlearned behaviors such as crying, sexual...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Purposive Learning
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...