Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relationships between single-vessel coronary artery obstructions and wall motion dysfunction analyzed by four

P Lorente, I Azancot, C Masquet

    International Journal of Cardiology
    |April 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Supporting the professional development of trial managers: how can you help?

    Trials·2025
    Same author

    Respiratory symptoms and chronic bronchitis in people with and without HIV infection.

    HIV medicine·2020
    Same author

    Investigation of the safety and feasibility of AAV1/SERCA2a gene transfer in patients with chronic heart failure supported with a left ventricular assist device - the SERCA-LVAD TRIAL.

    Gene therapy·2020
    Same author

    Factors associated with obesity in the Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Observations in People over Fifty (POPPY) cohort: an observational cross-sectional analysis.

    HIV medicine·2020
    Same author

    Level of agreement between frequently used cardiovascular risk calculators in people living with HIV.

    HIV medicine·2019
    Same author

    Can the ESC/EAS LDL-cholesterol target in patients with diabetes and high cardiovascular risk be achieved in clinical practice? Results from an ambulatory multidisciplinary diabetes center cohort.

    Diabetes & metabolism·2018

    Comparing four quantitative methods for analyzing regional wall motion in myocardial infarction patients, this study found no single method superior for all locations. Method sensitivity varied between anterior and inferior infarction groups.

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Regional wall motion abnormalities are key indicators of myocardial infarction (MI).
    • Accurate quantitative assessment of these abnormalities is crucial for diagnosis and management.
    • Several quantitative methods exist, but their comparative performance across different MI locations is not fully established.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the sensitivity and specificity of four quantitative methods for assessing regional wall motion abnormalities.
    • To evaluate these methods in patients with anterior myocardial infarction (AMI) and inferior myocardial infarction (IMI).
    • To determine if any single method demonstrates universal superiority for wall motion analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of cineangiograms from 238 patients, divided into normal, AMI, and IMI groups.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of four quantitative methods: long axis, center of mass (internal reference), Stanford model derived, and area-based (external reference).
  • Determination of normal regional values from a healthy cohort to assess method specificity and sensitivity.

    • Main Results:

    • The area-based method showed highest sensitivity in the anterior infarction group.
    • The center of mass method demonstrated the highest sensitivity in the inferior infarction group.
    • Qualitative analysis confirmed motion abnormalities in the corresponding walls for both anterior and inferior infarction groups.

    Conclusions:

    • No single quantitative method evaluated was superior to all others for every expected location of wall motion abnormality.
    • The choice of method may depend on the specific location and type of myocardial infarction.
    • Further research may be needed to refine or combine methods for optimal assessment.