Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Final Overall Survival and Molecular Data Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Ipatasertib and
Johann S de Bono1, Meng He2, Zhen Shi2
1Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital London UK.
Background And Objective:
In the phase 3 IPATential150 trial, ipatasertib addition to abiraterone significantly reduced the risk of disease progression in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with PTEN loss on immunohistochemistry (IHC), but not in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Here we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis and present results for prespecified and exploratory biomarker analyses.
Methods:
Patients were randomized to receive ipatasertib (400 mg once daily) or placebo. All patients received abiraterone (1000 mg once daily) and prednisone (5 mg twice daily). OS was assessed in patients with PTEN loss on IHC and the ITT population. Exploratory biomarker analyses included PTEN status via next-generation sequencing (NGS) and other key genomic alterations.
Key Findings And Limitations:
At final analysis (median follow-up 33.9 mo), ipatasertib addition did not improve OS for patients with PTEN loss in IHC (n = 521; stratified hazard ratio [sHR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.17; p = 0.57) or the ITT population (n = 1101; sHR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.07; not formally tested). Exploratory NGS assessments identified subgroups with genomic PTEN loss (n = 208) or PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations (n = 250), with potentially better outcomes from ipatasertib (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54-1.07; and HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.96, respectively). Limitations include the exploratory nature of the analysis, incomplete availability of NGS data, and potential intrapatient heterogeneity.
Conclusions And Clinical Implications:
Ipatasertib addition to abiraterone did not improve OS for men with mCRPC, regardless of PTEN status on IHC. Exploratory biomarker analyses identified additional genomic alterations of potential clinical relevance for AKT blockade in mCRPC that require further validation in prospective studies.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...